Specifying the differentiated contribution of farmers to groundwater depletion in two irrigated areas in North Africa

Abstract

Much attention has been paid to the issue of groundwater depletion linked to intensive groundwater-based agriculture in (semi-)arid areas. Often referred to as the “overexploitation” of aquifers, groundwater depletion is generally attributed to the entire agricultural sector without distinguishing between different uses and users. Although it expresses a general concern for future users, the ambiguous term of “overexploitation” does not acknowledge the contested nature of groundwater use and emerging inequalities. Also, the impact of inequality on groundwater depletion is rarely questioned. The aim of this article is to investigate how and by whom groundwater is depleted, and in turn, how unequal access to groundwater fuels the socioeconomic differentiation of farms and groundwater depletion. Based on a detailed analysis of groundwater use from a user perspective in two irrigated areas in North Africa (Morocco and Algeria), this study shows how the context of groundwater depletion exacerbates—and is exacerbated by—existing inequalities. The paper concludes that knowing how much is withdrawn, where, and by whom provides helpful information for more informed groundwater management by a better understanding of the response of users to declining groundwater conditions and the interests and incentives of different social categories of famers to contribute to groundwater management. (Résumé d'auteur

Inspiring a Broader Socio‐Hydrological Negotiation Approach With Interdisciplinary Field‐Based Experience

“…Socio‐hydrological, nonstochastic models generally seek to represent the development of systems causally and deterministically: the future of a system is only determined by past or present phenomena, and “initial conditions” defined in the “present” correspond to a single possible “future” state at each subsequent time step. In the Kairouan Plain—and the same observation was made in the Saïss Region in Morocco (Figure )—qualitative investigations showed that some irrigators apply the “use up the aquifer before your neighbor does” strategy, while others have a more patrimonial attitude to natural resources, for example, limiting their dependence on groundwater for farming (see Ameur et al, ). Projecting their behavior into a future where the aquifer will have been depleted changes their actions in different ways, illustrating how human dynamics can be influenced by hypothetical hydrologic changes.…”

“…In the latter case, although the socio‐hydrological field‐based approach did not result in the construction of a socio‐hydrological model, it nevertheless made it possible to deconstruct a certain number of hypotheses, especially the direct link between the number of pumping wells and groundwater abstraction, as well as the exponential expansion of the number of wells. This led to the reorientation of hydrological research toward the definition of new protocols for measuring the amount of groundwater use by including farmers' strategies and logic (Massuel et al, ) and specifying the differentiated contribution of various social categories (Ameur et al, ).…”

Considering groundwater use to improve the assessment of groundwater pumping for irrigation in North Africa

“…The knowledge was shared in both directions (see Ameur et al 2017a). Farmers provided information about the configuration of the irrigation systems, about their agricultural practices and strategies, constraints etc.…”

The rural social contract in Morocco and Algeria: reshaping through economic liberalisation and new rules and practices

“…In the face of these difficulties, the governments and local administrations opted for securing the social peace in rural areas by tolerating sometimes illegal practices that would allow farmers to keep their agricultural production in spite of mounting difficulties. Examples include informal land leasing, illegal drilling (Ameur et al 2017), and the extension of irrigated areas in highly water-scarce and therefore protected regions such as the Souss valley (Houdret, 2012). Moreover, representatives of the Moroccan Agricultural Ministry and of the Ministry of Interior explicitly advised the drinking and irrigation water authorities not to insist when water users did not pay their fees or illegally abstracted water, in order to avoid social unrest (Faysse et al 2012;Fofack, Kuper, and Petit 2015, Own observations in 2016-2017 After 2005, governments in both countries proclaimed new agricultural policies and mobilised important public investments to boost productivity, especially for high-value-added export products.…”