2008
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00551-08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specificity of L1 Peptides versus Virus-Like Particles for Detection of Human Papillomavirus-Positive Cervical Lesions in Females Attending Engativa Hospital, Bogota, Colombia

Abstract: A serological test for the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in females at risk of developing cervical cancer could be based on conserved L1 peptides with low levels of antigenicity specifically recognized by antibodies from patients with cervical lesions infected with high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) types. The aim was to assess the ability of L1 peptides 18283, 18294, and 18301 compared with the ability of virus-like particles (VLPs) to identify these infections in females. A total of 391 HPV-infected … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Central and South American seroprevalence data were available for women from Argentina (16), Brazil (109-111), Colombia (111-115), and Costa Rica (116,117) (Supplementary Figure 1I-J). No data on HPV seroprevalence in children and adolescents under age 15 were available (16).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central and South American seroprevalence data were available for women from Argentina (16), Brazil (109-111), Colombia (111-115), and Costa Rica (116,117) (Supplementary Figure 1I-J). No data on HPV seroprevalence in children and adolescents under age 15 were available (16).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in the Wang SS and colleagues study [ 33 ], it was shown that the anti-VLPs HPV16/18 antibodies were strongly associated with the HPV DNA-positive CIN3/cancer women group (OR = 34.7 and 16.6, respectively), but the associations dropped drastically when only the presence of anti-VLPs HPV16/18 antibodies were considered in the statistical analysis (OR = 2.0 and 1.9, respectively) [ 33 ]. In contrast, Urquiza and colleague’s study [ 18 ] showed that antibodies against three L1 peptides from HPV16 were more sensitive than anti-VLPs antibodies for the detection of HPV DNA-positive cervical lesions [ 18 ]. Our results are in agreement with both studies, as we observed a similar low association for anti-VLPs-16 antibodies in the CIN3/CC group (OR = 2.29), as in the Wang report when the HPV DNA status was not considered in the analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, by using and ELISA-VLPs for HPV16, the prevalence range was from 7% to 43% in healthy women, from 25% to 68% among women with CIN lesions, and from 28% to 100% among women with CC [ 14 , 15 , 21 , 23 , 40 ]. When the L1 protein from HPV16 was used in the ELISA (linear L1 or recombinant GST-L1), the prevalence varied from 3% to 52% in healthy women, from 10% to 95% in CIN lesions, and from 21% to 100% in CC [ 17 , 18 , 41 , 42 ]. The variability in the ELISA results could be due to differences in the antigen preparations (VLPs or L1) used by each laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations