2019
DOI: 10.1177/1745691619851784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specificity of Future Thinking in Depression: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Reduced specificity of autobiographical memory has been well established in depression, but whether this overgenerality extends to future thinking has not been the focus of a meta-analysis. Following a preregistered protocol, we searched six electronic databases, Google Scholar, and personal libraries and contacted authors in the field for studies matching search terms related to depression, future thinking, and specificity. We reduced an initial 7,332 results to 46 included studies, with 89 effect sizes and 4… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
55
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(167 reference statements)
4
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that the observer perspective bias may be a bias that is not specific to autobiographical memory but relevant to other types of autobiographical thinking. This echoes other cognitive biases that are present for memory and imagined future events such as reduced autobiographical specificity (Gamble et al, 2019;Hallford et al, 2020b;Sumner et al, 2010;Williams et al, 2007). Interestingly, we found different measures of depressive symptoms were associated with different temporalities of visual perspective.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results suggest that the observer perspective bias may be a bias that is not specific to autobiographical memory but relevant to other types of autobiographical thinking. This echoes other cognitive biases that are present for memory and imagined future events such as reduced autobiographical specificity (Gamble et al, 2019;Hallford et al, 2020b;Sumner et al, 2010;Williams et al, 2007). Interestingly, we found different measures of depressive symptoms were associated with different temporalities of visual perspective.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Furthermore, imagined future events are phenomenologically different as they are less vivid, less relevant to identity and life story, and more positive than autobiographical memories (Berntsen & Bohn, 2010;McDermott et al, 2016). Individuals with depression and high depressive symptoms have reductions in future autobiographical specificity in comparison to non-depressed participants (Gamble et al, 2019;Hallford et al, 2018), but very few studies have investigated the relationship between visual perspective for imagined autobiographical events and depression. Such research is important as it can clarify whether the observer bias is a general cognitive bias for all episodic thinking or whether it relates to past memories alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, patients with depression show deficits in retrieving concrete, specific details of positive episodic memories (Williams & Scott 1988). These patients also show deficits in updating negative abstract representations from new, concrete instances to the contrary (Korn et al 2014), and in producing vivid prospections about future positive events (Gamble et al 2019). These patients have access to abstract knowledge, but without concrete details, they are stymied in their attempts to simulate successfully.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it would be of interest to evaluate whether future thinking in depression would activate lower emotional and higher neutral facial expressions. It would be also of interest to evaluate whether these neutral facial expressions may mirror the overgenerality of future thinking in depression, that is, the tendency of patients with depression to imagine general rather than specific future scenarios (Gamble et al, 2019). Because this overgenerality has been intimately associated with avoidance strategies (Williams, 2006), increased neutral and decreased emotional facial expressions may mirror these strategies during future thinking in depression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%