2000
DOI: 10.1128/jb.182.6.1600-1608.2000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specificity Mutants of the Binding Protein of the Oligopeptide Transport System of Lactococcus lactis

Abstract: The kinetic properties of wild-type and mutant oligopeptide binding proteins of Lactococcus lactis were determined. To observe the properties of the mutant proteins in vivo, the oppA gene was deleted from the chromosome of L. lactis to produce a strain that was totally defective in oligopeptide transport. Amplified expression of the oppA gene resulted in an 8-to 12-fold increase in OppA protein relative to the wild-type level. The amplified expression was paralleled by increased bradykinin binding activity, bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(36 reference statements)
3
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For the specificity studies, we used saturating OppA concentrations, implying that substrate binding or delivery to the translocator is not rate-determining. This mimics the in vivo situation where overexpression of OppA in wild-type L. lactis cells increased the amount of peptide binding but did not affect the rate of uptake (27). Furthermore, the K m for bradykinin transport in vivo (0.27 Ϯ 0.03 M) (27) and in vitro (0.9 Ϯ 0.2 M) are in the same range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the specificity studies, we used saturating OppA concentrations, implying that substrate binding or delivery to the translocator is not rate-determining. This mimics the in vivo situation where overexpression of OppA in wild-type L. lactis cells increased the amount of peptide binding but did not affect the rate of uptake (27). Furthermore, the K m for bradykinin transport in vivo (0.27 Ϯ 0.03 M) (27) and in vitro (0.9 Ϯ 0.2 M) are in the same range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This mimics the in vivo situation where overexpression of OppA in wild-type L. lactis cells increased the amount of peptide binding but did not affect the rate of uptake (27). Furthermore, the K m for bradykinin transport in vivo (0.27 Ϯ 0.03 M) (27) and in vitro (0.9 Ϯ 0.2 M) are in the same range. Thus, both in vivo and in vitro there is a large excess of OppA over OppBCDF, and the rate-determining step for bradykinin uptake is in translocation and not in peptide binding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Le fait de surproduire OppA à la surface des cellules bactériennes [20] augmente la capacité d'OppA à lier un peptide donné mais n'augmente pas celle du transport sensu-stricto. L'étape limitante du transport d'un peptide n'est donc pas sa fixation sur OppA mais plus vraisemblablement son transfert vers le complexe transmembranaire OppBC (étapes III-IV du modèle Fig.…”
Section: Spécificité Du Système Opp Chez L Lactis Mg1363unclassified
“…Pour savoir si la variabilité de séquen-ces des OppA peut être à l'origine de la variabilité de transport des peptides entre les souches, les gènes oppA des quatre souches (MG1363, IL1403, Wg2 et CNRZ437) ont été exprimés chez la souche MG1363 délétée pour le gène oppA (souche AMP15, [20]) [4].…”
Section: Construction De Systèmes Opp Hybridesunclassified
“…Xac mostra-se do tipo α/β, consistindo em uma mistura de folhas β rodeadas por α- A qualidade do modelo foi avaliada com o programa PROCHECK (LASKOWSKI et al, 1993 HILLES et al, 1986;FENNO et al, 2000;MONNET, 2003), Bsu (MONNET, 2003, Bbu (PICON et al, 2000) e Lla (TAME et al, 1995) …”
Section: Modelagem Molecular Da Proteína Ligadora De Oligopeptídeos (unclassified