“…Figure 4 shows the effect of the CO2 injection rate on the SSA for both the MBG and AD. The SSA of the particles from the gypsum suspension after the MBG process (black squares (□) in Figure 4 [11]. This result agrees with the PS data in the sense that the SSA values are almost constant when using the MBG, regardless of the calcium source.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The average PS was 2.6 ± 0.8 μm [11]. It is interesting that the size of the CaCO3 particles was almost the same regardless of the type of calcium source, when the MBG was used for either the CM or the PCC method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The horizontal axis indicates the CO2 injection rate into the calcium-source suspensions. The PS results using Ca(OH)2 are from our previous paper [11]. The values in blue triangles are from reference [4] when 101-160 µm bubbles were used, and these are approximate values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The images of the particles were obtained using a Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FE-SEM) (S4700, Hitachi, Japan) located at Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI) Jeonju Center. The PS and SSA of the particles presented here for the PCC method were from previous research [11].…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the effect of CO2 bubble size of larger bubbles from an air diffuser (AD) and tiny bubbles from MBG on the PS and SSA was estimated by the results from the experiments and the reference [4]. The PS and SSA results presented here for the PCC method are from our previous research [11]. The results from the current study should be useful for designing a CM process to achieve two aims: effective CO2 fixation, and production of CaCO3 with properties useful for industrial use.…”
Abstract:The effects of CO2 flow rate and calcium source on the particle size (PS) and specific surface area (SSA) of CaCO3 particles were evaluated using microbubble generator (MBG) and air diffuser (AD) systems. The carbonate mineralization (CM) and precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC) methods were employed to produce CaCO3 using gypsum and Ca(OH)2 as the calcium sources, respectively. The CaCO3 particles prepared using the MBG were smaller (with larger specific surface area) than those obtained using the conventional AD, regardless of the calcium source. The average PSs were 2-3 and 7-9 μm for the MBG and AD systems, respectively. Moreover, the PS and SSA of the particles prepared using the MBG were not greatly affected by the CO2 injection rate. This study clearly demonstrates that the use of an MBG ensures the stable production of fine CaCO3 particles using various calcium sources and a wider range of CO2 flow rates.
“…Figure 4 shows the effect of the CO2 injection rate on the SSA for both the MBG and AD. The SSA of the particles from the gypsum suspension after the MBG process (black squares (□) in Figure 4 [11]. This result agrees with the PS data in the sense that the SSA values are almost constant when using the MBG, regardless of the calcium source.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The average PS was 2.6 ± 0.8 μm [11]. It is interesting that the size of the CaCO3 particles was almost the same regardless of the type of calcium source, when the MBG was used for either the CM or the PCC method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The horizontal axis indicates the CO2 injection rate into the calcium-source suspensions. The PS results using Ca(OH)2 are from our previous paper [11]. The values in blue triangles are from reference [4] when 101-160 µm bubbles were used, and these are approximate values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The images of the particles were obtained using a Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FE-SEM) (S4700, Hitachi, Japan) located at Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI) Jeonju Center. The PS and SSA of the particles presented here for the PCC method were from previous research [11].…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the effect of CO2 bubble size of larger bubbles from an air diffuser (AD) and tiny bubbles from MBG on the PS and SSA was estimated by the results from the experiments and the reference [4]. The PS and SSA results presented here for the PCC method are from our previous research [11]. The results from the current study should be useful for designing a CM process to achieve two aims: effective CO2 fixation, and production of CaCO3 with properties useful for industrial use.…”
Abstract:The effects of CO2 flow rate and calcium source on the particle size (PS) and specific surface area (SSA) of CaCO3 particles were evaluated using microbubble generator (MBG) and air diffuser (AD) systems. The carbonate mineralization (CM) and precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC) methods were employed to produce CaCO3 using gypsum and Ca(OH)2 as the calcium sources, respectively. The CaCO3 particles prepared using the MBG were smaller (with larger specific surface area) than those obtained using the conventional AD, regardless of the calcium source. The average PSs were 2-3 and 7-9 μm for the MBG and AD systems, respectively. Moreover, the PS and SSA of the particles prepared using the MBG were not greatly affected by the CO2 injection rate. This study clearly demonstrates that the use of an MBG ensures the stable production of fine CaCO3 particles using various calcium sources and a wider range of CO2 flow rates.
Rauchgase aus Kohlekraftwerken enthalten beträchtliche Mengen an Schwefeldioxid, die für die Umwelt dramatische Folgen haben können. Die richtige Auslegung von Entschwefelungsverfahren ist entscheidend und beruht überwiegend auf empirischen Ansätzen. Um die Belastbarkeit und die Zuverlässigkeit des Auslegungsverfahrens zu verbessern, wurde ein Rechenmodel für die trockene Entschwefelung von Rauchgasen mit Partikeln auf Calciumbasis entwickelt. Der detaillierte Aufbau wird beschrieben und die Berechnungsergebnisse mit Prozessdaten aus einem Steinkohlekraftwerk verglichen. Anschließend wurde exemplarisch eine Sensitivitätsanalyse durchgeführt.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.