1930
DOI: 10.1084/jem.52.4.477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific Precipitation and Mouse Protection in Type I Antipneumococcus Sera

Abstract: Specific precipitation has long been known to occur in antipneumococcus sera showing marked protective power in mice (1), but it has been possible only recently to obtain indications of a parallel variation in these two properties. Thus Friedlander, Sobotka and Banzhaf (2) showed that the number of mouse protection units in certain Type I and Type II antipneumococcus sera varied in the same sense as the "precipitin index." In the preceding communication Zozaya, Boyer, and Clark (3) have shown that it is possib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1932
1932
1960
1960

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(Received for publication, December 27, 1934) Experiments were reported several years ago by the writers (1) leading to an absolute method for the determination of precipitins (2)(3)(4). It was originally thought that by following the usual immunological technique, namely incubation of precipitin reactions at 37°C.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Received for publication, December 27, 1934) Experiments were reported several years ago by the writers (1) leading to an absolute method for the determination of precipitins (2)(3)(4). It was originally thought that by following the usual immunological technique, namely incubation of precipitin reactions at 37°C.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative precipitin te8t. Antigen was determined by total N determinations on the specific precipitate according to the method of Heidelberger, Sia & Kendall (1930).…”
Section: Analytical Method8mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods used were the conventional ones for: nitrogen, glucose number, optical rotation, precipitin titer, immune precipitable nitrogen (Heidelberger, Sia and Kendall, 1930), and active immunity produced in mice. Two methods have been used for this last test, one varying the dose of antigen from 0.5 ml.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%