1973
DOI: 10.1007/bf00654912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific heats of solid natural neon at five molar volumes and of the separated neon isotopes atP=0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
2

Year Published

1975
1975
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2. It is seen that our results, the heat capacity of solid Ne [9] and the sum of p-H 2 (5.1%) and Ne (94.9%) differ less than by 7%.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…2. It is seen that our results, the heat capacity of solid Ne [9] and the sum of p-H 2 (5.1%) and Ne (94.9%) differ less than by 7%.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Table I also includes smoothed values of C v as calculated from the data of FS, 2 molar volumes from the x-ray data, 4 selected values of the adiabatic bulk modulus, and corresponding Grfineisen parameters calculated iteratively using Eqs. (1) and (2). The saturated vapor pressure values differ significantly from the P = 0 values only for the thermal expansion coefficient and hence for "~,.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…(1) using the actual experimental ~'s (fl = 3~t) and smoothed values of Cv, V, and B s (see Table I) that correspond to the experimental temperatures. In this calculation, the relation Cp/Cv = Bs./Br = 1 4-flTT (2) also is required, since the basic data are B s and Cv. Figure 1 is, in effect, a plot of the deviations of the experimental values of the expansion coefficient from the smoothed relation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters produce reasonable results for the cohesive energies and for the temperature dependence of the bulk modulus at zero pressure, but they do not give good agreement for the pressure dependence of the bulk modulus (19). An adequate two-body potential has not been found as yet for neon, but the recent work definitely has shown that the LJ 6-12 potential is not correct (16,19 (20,21) and constant volume (22,23), and several measurements…”
Section: Chapter I Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%