2019
DOI: 10.1109/tifs.2018.2855665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific Emitter Identification Based on Variational Mode Decomposition and Spectral Features in Single Hop and Relaying Scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this study, we considered randomly varying SNR values within a range (not a single value), as this could better represent dynamic radio links of low power IoT devices, such as BT [18]. To this end, three different datasets with different SNR levels were created based on the ranges of SNR given in literature [6,7,15]: a) low SNR (-5 -0 dB), b) moderate SNR (0 -5 dB), and c) high SNR (5 -10 dB). Note that the distribution of SNR values of each dataset (and each device) were created to follow approximately Gaussian distribution in order to prove that the performance is evaluated with varying SNR values within the range.…”
Section: Data Collection (Signal Capturing) and Transient Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in this study, we considered randomly varying SNR values within a range (not a single value), as this could better represent dynamic radio links of low power IoT devices, such as BT [18]. To this end, three different datasets with different SNR levels were created based on the ranges of SNR given in literature [6,7,15]: a) low SNR (-5 -0 dB), b) moderate SNR (0 -5 dB), and c) high SNR (5 -10 dB). Note that the distribution of SNR values of each dataset (and each device) were created to follow approximately Gaussian distribution in order to prove that the performance is evaluated with varying SNR values within the range.…”
Section: Data Collection (Signal Capturing) and Transient Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is computationally simple, and does not suffer from any mode mixing problem. Its superiority over EMD has been reported in various applications, such as the monitoring of wind turbines [14], single hop and relaying scenarios [15], fluctuation analysis [16], and pulse radar fingerprint extraction [17]. On the other hand, regarding the performance of VMD with transient signals, VMD has been successfully demonstrated with Bluetooth (BT) devices [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the VMD algorithm is an adaptive, quasi-orthogonal and completely non-recursive decomposition method, consisting of classical Wiener Filtering, Hilbert Transform and frequency mixing. It decomposes the input signals composed of multi-components into several inherent modes with limited bandwidth, and most of these modes are closely around their corresponding central frequencies, which meet the definition of intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) [31].…”
Section: Variational Mode Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these disturbances, the ripple is a very complex subject, and the ripple detection in DC links is critical for the evaluation of PQ of DC systems, because evaluating PQ reasonably and effectively is the first step in improving power supply quality [13], the quantification for ripple are convenient for the construction of DC PQ evaluation model. Currently, many methods for ripple detection of AC signal have been proposed [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], such as Hilbert-Huang transform (HHT) [14,15], fast Fourier transform (FFT) [16][17][18], empirical mode decomposition (EMD) [19,20] and variational mode decomposition (VMD) [21,22] etc. The FFT algorithm is broadly utilized in industrial applications because of its fast and efficient advantages [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation