1995
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.33.11.2864-2867.1995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species by multiplex PCR

Abstract: In Staphylococcus aureus, mecA and femA are the genetic determinants of methicillin resistance. By using a multiplex PCR strategy, 310-and 686-bp regions of the mecA and femA genes, respectively, were coamplified to identify susceptible (lacking mecA) and resistant (mecA ؉) staphylococci and to differentiate S. aureus (femA ؉) from coagulase-negative staphylococci (lacking femA). A third staphylococcal genomic sequence, corresponding to IS431 and spanning 444 bp, was used as a PCR control. One hundred sixty-fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
90
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(27 reference statements)
3
90
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Isolates consistent with staphylococcal species were prepared for antimicrobial sensitivity testing according to BSAC guidelines using 10 antimicrobial discs: methicillin (5 mg), gentamicin (10 mg), rifampicin (2 mg), tetracycline (10 mg), vancomycin (5 mg), teicoplanin (30 mg), ciprofloxacin (1 mg), co-trimoxazole (25 mg), fusidic acid (10 mg), mupirocin (5 mg). All unique staphylococcal isolates were subjected to previously reported PCR assays for the mecA gene for methicillin resistance, and the femA and nuc genes for identification of S. aureus (Brakstad et al 1992;Vannuffel et al 1995). All isolates confirmed as S. aureus were subjected to molecular characterisation by spa gene typing and SCCmec typing in accordance with previously published methods (Oliveira and de Lencastre 2002;Harmsen et al 2003).…”
Section: Sample Collection and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolates consistent with staphylococcal species were prepared for antimicrobial sensitivity testing according to BSAC guidelines using 10 antimicrobial discs: methicillin (5 mg), gentamicin (10 mg), rifampicin (2 mg), tetracycline (10 mg), vancomycin (5 mg), teicoplanin (30 mg), ciprofloxacin (1 mg), co-trimoxazole (25 mg), fusidic acid (10 mg), mupirocin (5 mg). All unique staphylococcal isolates were subjected to previously reported PCR assays for the mecA gene for methicillin resistance, and the femA and nuc genes for identification of S. aureus (Brakstad et al 1992;Vannuffel et al 1995). All isolates confirmed as S. aureus were subjected to molecular characterisation by spa gene typing and SCCmec typing in accordance with previously published methods (Oliveira and de Lencastre 2002;Harmsen et al 2003).…”
Section: Sample Collection and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined using the disk-diffusion method, performed according to CLSI guidelines [19], for oxacillin, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, minocycline, trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin and rifampicin. Resistance to oxacillin was confirmed by detecting the presence of the mecA gene by PCR [20].…”
Section: Bacterial Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fem gene of S. aureus encodes a protein that influences the level of methicillin resistance of S. aureus. This gene too has been reported to be specific to S. aureus (Vannuffel et al 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%