1972
DOI: 10.1021/je60052a029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific conductance of concentrated solutions of magnesium salts in water-ethanol system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
109
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 1 shows the specific conductivity κ and the molar conductivity Λ of KF + GC solutions as a function of c. The data of κ and Λ were fitted according to the Casteel-Amis equation [15], and to the Fuoss-Kraus model, respectively (see Appendix A) [16].…”
Section: Electric Conductivity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fig. 1 shows the specific conductivity κ and the molar conductivity Λ of KF + GC solutions as a function of c. The data of κ and Λ were fitted according to the Casteel-Amis equation [15], and to the Fuoss-Kraus model, respectively (see Appendix A) [16].…”
Section: Electric Conductivity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific conductivity (κ) was fitted according to the Casteel-Amis model that provides an empirical equation commonly used to describe the conductivity behavior of electrolytes over wide ranges of salt concentration [15,36]. In this model the relation between κ and the concentration m (in molal units) is expressed as:…”
Section: Appendix a Casteel-amis Equation And Fuoss-kraus Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most conspicuous feature emerging from these plots is the ''dome'' shape of the surfaces, as a result of peaking in both m and w. Peaking of in m is a common feature for liquid electrolytes, reflecting the process of first increasing with the number of dissociated ions as m increases and then falling as the rise in and in ion association become dominant; this has been observed for many electrolytes of lithium salts. 1,2,[5][6][7]14,15,22,[31][32][33] Peaking of in w, on the other hand, seems to be the result of the and of DEC both being much lower than those of PC and both being monotonic functions of w. As such, as w rises from zero, the change of is first dominated by the fall of of the electrolyte causing to rise and then by the fall of of the solvent which by allowing stronger ion association causes to fall. The same behavior has been observed in LiPF 6 -(PC-DEC), 1 LiBF 4 -(PC-DEC), 2 and LiPF 6 -(EC-EMC), 7 where the linear carbonates DEC and EMC have much lower and than their cyclic counterparts PC and EC, and in LiClO 4 -(PC-DME) 8 and NaClO 4 -(PC-DME), 9 where DME ͑dimethoxyethane͒ has a much lower and than PC.…”
Section: 25mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 shows the typical concentration-dependence of the specific conductance, x[Q 1 cm" 1 ], of LiClO 4 at various temperatures in propylene carbonate 232) and propylene carbonate-dimethoxyethane mixtures 227) . Lacking a reliable theory, an empirical equation 231) was used to reproduce the conductance data. The concentration, m max , at maximum conductance, x mux , decreases with decreasing temperature, i.e.…”
Section: Concentrated Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%