1983
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-12065-3_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-aqueous electrolyte solutions in chemistry and modern technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 573 publications
(185 reference statements)
2
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the magnitude and shape of L(c) is influenced by ion association. 17,49 As would be expected from the viscosities of the pure solvents (Table S1 Fig. 2).…”
Section: Ion Transportsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the magnitude and shape of L(c) is influenced by ion association. 17,49 As would be expected from the viscosities of the pure solvents (Table S1 Fig. 2).…”
Section: Ion Transportsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…1 and 2 and Fig. S1 and Table S2, ESIw), were analyzed in the framework of Barthel's low-concentration chemical model, 17,49 (lcCM) which very successfully describes thermodynamic and transport properties of solutions of 1 : 1 electrolytes up to B0.15 M. For the evaluation of molar conductivities of dilute (t0.01 M) solutions this approach uses the equations…”
Section: Molar Conductivitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitromethane, being protophobic, is characterized by very low basicity (donicity number DN (11) = 2.7), thus high cationic heteroconjugation constants may be expected in this solvent. In contrast, DMF is a protophilic aprotic solvent of very weak acidity and relatively strong basicity (11) (DN = 26.6), and therefore only a very small extent of cationic heteroconjugation in this solvent can be expected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have shown that the tendency towards heteroconjugation of substituted pyridine N -oxides depends on solvent basicity and decreases with increasing basicity of solvents in the following order: nitrobenzene > propylene carbonate > acetonitrile > acetone > methanol. In this series, donicity numbers of the solvents are: (11) 4.4, 15.1, 14.1, 17.0, and 19.1, respectively; the exception observed in the case of propylene carbonate may be explained in terms of the much stronger polarity of propylene carbonate compared with that of acetonitrile (the dielectric constants (11) are 64.4 and 35.95 for propylene carbonate and acetonitrile, respectively), whereas the proton-donating and proton-accepting properties of propylene carbonate closely resemble those of acetonitrile (donicity numbers (11) of these solvents are 15.1 and 14.1, and the acceptor numbers (11) 18.3 and 18.1, respectively). It has been found (9) that, in the case of comparable basicities of the two solvents, the increase in solvent polarity results in enhancement of the tendency towards cationic heteroconjugation in the N -oxide systems studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density and ultrasonic velocity data are significant basic properties to investigation mass transfers and compressibility of scientifically prospective fluids. Transport properties of electrolytes in aqueous, non-aqueous and mixed solvents are of concern in assorted technologies like high energy density batteries, electro deposition and in electr-oganic synthesis 1 . Viscosity, density and ultrasonic velocity measurements of electrolyte solutions are admirable apparatus to perceive solute-solvent and solute-solute interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%