“…Their relative invasiveness makes it difficult to obtain several biopsies from the same subjects to study, due to, for instance, the time-course response of the skeletal muscle to interventions, such as exercise training or anabolic drug supplementation [9]. Less invasive alternatives to the semiopen muscle biopsy have been proposed by several authors working in different medical areas, such as muscular oncology [10], neuromuscular diseases [11,12] and cardiac failure [13,14]. Fine-needle muscle biopsies, also termed microbiopsies, were successfully used to obtain muscle tissue in several studies, but, to the current authors' knowledge, the results obtained with these techniques have never been compared with the semi-open techniques.…”