Species-wide homogeneity of nuclear ribosomal ITS2 sequences in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae contrasts with extensive mitochondrial COI polymorphism
Abstract:We compared patterns of intraspecific polymorphism of two markers with contrasted modes of evolution, nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), in the phytophagous mite Tetranychus urticae Koch. The second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) of rDNA and a fragment in the mtDNA gene coding for Cytochrome Oxidase I (COI), were PCR-amplified and sequenced in samples of various geographical origins distributed worldwide. The 15 COI haplotypes found fell into two major phylogenetic lineages differi… Show more
“…In addition, Zahler et al (1998) and Essig et al (1999) were not able to find clear differences within the worldwide distributed genera Psoroptes and Chorioptes, respectively. However, Navajas et al (1998) showed extensive polymorphism in sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I in T. urticae. Some sorts of geographical or host specificity in Sarcoptes populations have been shown in studies in which microsatellites were used as markers (Walton et al, 2004;Soglia et al, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of variable sites was very different among populations: the population ItNWVv was the most variable (30 mutations), whereas the ItNWMf (4 mutations) and SpNEVv (5 mutations ITS-2 rDNA appears to be suitable genetic marker for distinguishing closely related species and examining phylogenetic relationships within genera but not suitable for genetic characterization within a species for mites (Navajas et al, 1994(Navajas et al, , 1998Navajas and Fenton, 2000;Zahler et al, 1998Zahler et al, , 1999Essig et al, 1999;Berrilli et al, 2002). For example, Navajas et al (1998 found very low variation in ITS-2 sequences within Tetranychus urticae. Similar patterns of variation were found by Navajas et al (1994) for Mononychellus progresivus and, as mentioned above, by Zahler et al (1999) and Berrilli et al (2002) for Sarcoptes.…”
“…In addition, Zahler et al (1998) and Essig et al (1999) were not able to find clear differences within the worldwide distributed genera Psoroptes and Chorioptes, respectively. However, Navajas et al (1998) showed extensive polymorphism in sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I in T. urticae. Some sorts of geographical or host specificity in Sarcoptes populations have been shown in studies in which microsatellites were used as markers (Walton et al, 2004;Soglia et al, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of variable sites was very different among populations: the population ItNWVv was the most variable (30 mutations), whereas the ItNWMf (4 mutations) and SpNEVv (5 mutations ITS-2 rDNA appears to be suitable genetic marker for distinguishing closely related species and examining phylogenetic relationships within genera but not suitable for genetic characterization within a species for mites (Navajas et al, 1994(Navajas et al, , 1998Navajas and Fenton, 2000;Zahler et al, 1998Zahler et al, , 1999Essig et al, 1999;Berrilli et al, 2002). For example, Navajas et al (1998 found very low variation in ITS-2 sequences within Tetranychus urticae. Similar patterns of variation were found by Navajas et al (1994) for Mononychellus progresivus and, as mentioned above, by Zahler et al (1999) and Berrilli et al (2002) for Sarcoptes.…”
“…According to extraction methods already published for various acari (Eriophyidae, Ixodidae, Laelapidae, Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae, Trombidiidae), we chose and compared three conventional methods for extracting DNA from D. gallinae: a CTAB method, with a lysis step followed by a phenol chloroform precipitation [17,20], a Qiamp DNA extraction kit using separation with a column [8,11], and a Chelex resin [10,14,21,25,28,29]. Another attractive method, the FTA technology, was also tested, and compared to the others.…”
-Dermanyssus gallinae is one of the most serious ectoparasites of poultry and it has been implicated as a vector of several major pathogenic diseases. Molecular detection of such pathogens in mites is crucial and therefore, an important step is the extraction of their DNA from mites. So, we compared four DNA extraction protocols from engorged and unfed individual mites: a conventional method using a Cethyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide buffer (CTAB), a Chelex resin, a Qiamp DNA extraction kit and a more recent one filter-based technology (FTA). The DNA samples have been tested for their ability to be amplified by an amplification of a D. gallinae 16S rRNA gene region. The best results were obtained using CTAB and Qiagen methods at the same time with unfed and engorged mites (96% and 100% of amplified samples). FTA produced similar results when using unfed mites but not when processing engorged ones (96% and 70%). Finally, the Chelex method was the least efficient in terms of DNA amplification, especially when applied on engorged individuals (50%). The possible inhibitor role of these Chelex extracted DNA was demonstrated by the means of a PCR control on PUC plasmid. No difference was observed with CTAB, Qiamp DNA extraction kit or FTA methods using DNA extracted one year before.
D. gallinae / DNA extraction / engorged mites
“…Little is known about the molecular genetics of this group of sand flies (Esseghir et al, 1997;Ready et al, 1997Ready et al, , 1998Ishikawa et al, 1999). However, studies of the molecular phylogenetics of other arthropod groups suggest that sequence from region I of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene might be informative for clarifying Lutzomyia taxonomy at the species level (Navajas et al, 1994(Navajas et al, , 1996(Navajas et al, , 1998Roderick and Gillespie, 1998). Here, we present a phylogeographical interpretation of L. longipalpis based on molecular phylogenetic analysis using mtDNA and available theories on the historical physical geography of Central and South America (Haffer, 1969;Howe, 1974;Keigwin, 1978;Haffer, 1981;Rod, 1981;Sykes et al, 1982;Stehli and Webb, 1985;Hoorn, 1994;Hoorn et al, 1995).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.