2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is ITS-2 rDNA suitable marker for genetic characterization of Sarcoptes mites from different wild animals in different geographic areas?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
43
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous molecular studies of S. scabiei in animals and humans have utilized various gene targets, such as microsatellites, ITS-2 ribosomal DNA (rDNA), mitochondrial 12S/16S rRNA, and S. scabiei myosin heavy chain genes (41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous molecular studies of S. scabiei in animals and humans have utilized various gene targets, such as microsatellites, ITS-2 ribosomal DNA (rDNA), mitochondrial 12S/16S rRNA, and S. scabiei myosin heavy chain genes (41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numbers represent percentage of bootstrap confidence levels obtained from the NJ (a) and MP (b) methods. The species could be easily identified by the NJ and MP trees geographically different species (Alasaad et al 2009). Nevertheless, they can help us study low-level phylogenetic relationships between astigmatid mites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even such recently encountered mammals as koalas and wombats have become infected with scabies. Morphological variation between the strains is small or absent, and ITS-2 also shows no host-related variation (Alasaad et al 2012 ). However, there is some evidence of host-related population genetic differentiation in microsatellites (Rasero et al 2010 ) as well as physiological differences among scabies mites from different hosts.…”
Section: Mites On and In Mammalsmentioning
confidence: 94%