2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-016-2762-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species turnover drives β-diversity patterns across multiple spatial and temporal scales in Great Lake Coastal Wetland Communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few studies have employed measures of temporal β‐diversity, sensu Baselga (2010), to explore seasonal changes in community composition. Most of these concluded (as we did here) that strong seasonality is associated with elevated temporal turnover (Langer et al 2016, Maicher et al 2018, de Deus et al 2020, Duarte et al 2022). Even fewer studies have compared seasonal patterns of temporal β‐diversity between distinct habitat types.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Few studies have employed measures of temporal β‐diversity, sensu Baselga (2010), to explore seasonal changes in community composition. Most of these concluded (as we did here) that strong seasonality is associated with elevated temporal turnover (Langer et al 2016, Maicher et al 2018, de Deus et al 2020, Duarte et al 2022). Even fewer studies have compared seasonal patterns of temporal β‐diversity between distinct habitat types.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…However, our study has a notable limitation as it only covers one annual hydrological cycle and does not account for the effects of extreme episodic events. These events can significantly alter turnover and nestedness rates beyond typical seasonal ranges (Hatosy et al 2013, Langer et al 2016, Pilotto et al 2020). In aquatic ecosystems, such events may include extreme dry periods (Baruch et al 2022), exceptional spates or flood levels (Resh et al 1988, Saito et al 2021), sudden extreme deoxygenation events (Henderson et al 1998), and fluctuations in nutrient availability or other physico‐chemical water properties (Cook et al 2018, Kraus et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings underscore the importance of utilizing various diversity indices to conduct a comprehensive assessment of biological communities. We observed that the turnover component made the most significant contribution to beta diversity, indicating the need for conservation efforts to prioritize the establishment of different protected areas (Langer et al, 2016), since turnover dominance implies an approach considering multiple sites within a region, to ensure the protection of the greatest number of species (Socolar et al, 2016; Wright & Reeves, 1992). Considering the significant loss of species richness and abundance, along with the decline in functional richness identified in our study, it becomes imperative to continue environmental monitoring efforts, engage in discussions to mitigate local anthropogenic impacts, and establish conservation practices to ensure the preservation of biodiversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Turnover has emerged as the predominant factor shaping the structure of the ichthyofauna over the assessed time frame, indicating a relatively dynamic composition over time. The majority of species exhibited low occurrence frequencies, potentially associated with their seasonal nature, as they inhabit specific locations during particular seasons or life stages (Langer et al, 2016), thus contributing to the observed high species turnover. Moreover, the high turnover within this ecosystem could be attributed to distinct local environmental conditions, where the environmental gradient acts as a selective filter, favoring species with specific physiological requirements (Baselga, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our previous study, based on a different regional dataset, demonstrated that only a small proportion of variation in diversity can be consistently attributed to physical habitat drivers (Kovalenko et al 2018). Smaller-scale habitat factors (water quality, habitat alteration), high connectivity and resulting recolonization, and species turnover caused by harsh winter conditions (Langer et al 2016) likely override the importance of at least some of the watershed stressors. Previous studies of biodiversity identified the importance of habitat complexity (including habitat variables not measured in our study) for both tropical freshwater riverine fish (Ribeiro et al 2016) and coral reef fish (Richardson et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%