1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4731(85)80020-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species differences in the sensitivity to GnRH analogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier studies have shown that when administered to normal adult males, GnRH-analogues reduce the secretion of LH and FSH from the pituitary gland [4,5]. The reduction of gonadotropin secretion results in lower testosterone levels in testes, leading to the inhibition of spermatogenesis [40], particularly in postmeiotic phase [4,41,42]. In contrast, recent studies have shown that GnRH-analogues stimulate regeneration of spermatogenesis after testicular damage caused by irradia- tion or chemical toxins [3,6,8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier studies have shown that when administered to normal adult males, GnRH-analogues reduce the secretion of LH and FSH from the pituitary gland [4,5]. The reduction of gonadotropin secretion results in lower testosterone levels in testes, leading to the inhibition of spermatogenesis [40], particularly in postmeiotic phase [4,41,42]. In contrast, recent studies have shown that GnRH-analogues stimulate regeneration of spermatogenesis after testicular damage caused by irradia- tion or chemical toxins [3,6,8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have reported several nonpeptide antagonist series with remarkable selectivity for the human receptor compared with the rat receptor (10 -13). These observations are somewhat surprising given that, with one or two exceptions (14,15), similar degrees of species selectivity have not been reported for the thousands of peptide GnRH analogs that have been synthesized by numerous groups (16).…”
Section: Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (Gnrh)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We have reported several nonpeptide antagonist series with remarkable selectivity for the human receptor compared with the rat receptor (10 -13). These observations are somewhat surprising given that, with one or two exceptions (14,15), similar degrees of species selectivity have not been reported for the thousands of peptide GnRH analogs that have been synthesized by numerous groups (16).The rat GnRH receptor is highly homologous (87%) to the human receptor, whereas the receptor cloned from the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) contains only 8 substitutions of the 328 amino acids in the human sequence. Therefore, to identify the molecular basis of this species selectivity and identify residues involved in nonpeptide ligand binding to the GnRH receptor, we have investigated residues responsible for the selectivity of several nonpeptide GnRH antagonists for the human receptor over receptors from rat and macaque.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of adjuvant therapy is supposedly to produce atrophy of the spermatogenic epithelium. These authors could not dem onstrate any effects of leuprolide upon the testes of their mice, but it has been shown that the pituitary gonadal axis of the mouse is extremely insensitive to inhibition by the GnRH analogues [16]. Therefore it is not surprising that protection against the cisplatin was not achieved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%