2004
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m404474200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species Selectivity of Nonpeptide Antagonists of the Gonadotropinreleasing Hormone Receptor Is Determined by Residues in Extracellular Loops II and III and the Amino Terminus

Abstract: Efforts to develop orally available gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonists have led to the discovery of several classes of potent nonpeptide antagonists. Here we investigated molecular interactions of three classes of nonpeptide antagonists with human, rat, and macaque GnRH receptors. Although all are high affinity ligands of the human receptor (K i <5 nM), these compounds show reduced affinity for the macaque receptor and bind only weakly (K i >1 M) to the rat receptor. To identify residue… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(23 reference statements)
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GnRH-R and LH-R both have more than 80% amino acid homology between rat and man [24,25]. LH-R has been demonstrated in submucous and myenteric neurons in small and large intestine, glia cells and endothelial cells in man [17], while in rat LH-R-IR was exclusively confined to enteric neurons [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GnRH-R and LH-R both have more than 80% amino acid homology between rat and man [24,25]. LH-R has been demonstrated in submucous and myenteric neurons in small and large intestine, glia cells and endothelial cells in man [17], while in rat LH-R-IR was exclusively confined to enteric neurons [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Translating the results of animal studies to humans, however, can be hampered by differences between receptor orthologs. Species-related differences in the sequences of protein targets ("natural mutants") have previously been used to identify the molecular determinants of ligand binding to GPCRs (Reinhart et al, 2004;Lim et al, 2010;Milligan, 2011). Species differences have also been observed for CXCR2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to study therapeutic effects of H 4 R ligands in animal models of disease, it is important to characterize the H 4 R of the corresponding species. For several GPCRs, including the H 3 R, significant species differences are known and have seriously hampered drug discovery efforts (Oksenberg et al, 1992;Maconi et al, 2002;Reinhart et al, 2004;Hancock, 2006). Various species orthologs of H 4 R were promptly cloned based on their homology to the human H 4 R sequence (Oda et al, 2000), including those of mouse, rat, guinea pig, pig, monkey (Macaca fascilularis), and dog (Liu et al, 2001b;Oda et al, 2002Oda et al, , 2005Jiang et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%