1986
DOI: 10.1016/0048-3575(86)90091-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species differences in the in vitro inhibition of brain acetylcholinesterase and carboxylesterase by mipafox, paraoxon, and soman

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
4
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electric eel was more sensitive compared to human AChE for CPO, PMO and DZO, whereas the carbamates were less potent in electric eel AChE. Such species differences between birds, fishes and mammals, including rats, have also been demonstrated in earlier reports for brain AChE inhibition, particularly for oxon compounds and carbamates (Andersen et al 1977;Chattopadhyay et al 1986;Johnson and Wallace 1987;Murphy et al 1968;Qadri et al 1994). It has been hypothesised that differences in affinity and the rate of phosphorylation of AChE or differences in the steric arrangement in the active site can contribute to species differences, resulting in different IC 50 s and species sensitivity distributions dependent on the compound (Andersen et al 1977;Wang and Murphy 1982).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Electric eel was more sensitive compared to human AChE for CPO, PMO and DZO, whereas the carbamates were less potent in electric eel AChE. Such species differences between birds, fishes and mammals, including rats, have also been demonstrated in earlier reports for brain AChE inhibition, particularly for oxon compounds and carbamates (Andersen et al 1977;Chattopadhyay et al 1986;Johnson and Wallace 1987;Murphy et al 1968;Qadri et al 1994). It has been hypothesised that differences in affinity and the rate of phosphorylation of AChE or differences in the steric arrangement in the active site can contribute to species differences, resulting in different IC 50 s and species sensitivity distributions dependent on the compound (Andersen et al 1977;Wang and Murphy 1982).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Metabolic alteration of OP compounds in vivo would alter the toxicity compared with that expected from in vitro data. Amphibians are believed to be relatively resistant to acute OP intoxication compared with mammals and birds [16][17][18][19]. Our data support these results: most of the tested compounds did not show a strong correlation between in vivo and in vitro anticholinesterase effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Amphibians are believed to be relatively resistant to acute OP intoxication compared with mammals and birds [16][17][18][19]. Amphibians are believed to be relatively resistant to acute OP intoxication compared with mammals and birds [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species‐related differences in the inhibition capacity of brain AChE by OP compounds that were closely related to the susceptibility of the species to OP poisoning were shown in previous studies. For example, AChE inhibition related to the toxicity of mipafox, paraoxon, somon, tabun, sarin, dimethylphosphorylfluoride, and diethylphosphorylfluoride were higher in chickens and in rats than in frogs (Andersen et al, ; Chattopadhyay et al, ). Wang and Murphy () also showed that chicken brain AChE was 100‐fold more sensitive to inhibition by methyl paraoxon than frog brain AChE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%