2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-017-0139-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species, Climate and Landscape Physiography Drive Variable Growth Trends in Subalpine Forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After accounting for the percent of basal area lost, juveniles were growing faster in topographically wetter sites and sites at lower slope positions where temperatures are presumably warmer. However, faster growth rates of juvenile fir than spruce may be short‐lived if the effects of warming on adult fir growth are more deleterious than the effects on spruce growth (Kelsey et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After accounting for the percent of basal area lost, juveniles were growing faster in topographically wetter sites and sites at lower slope positions where temperatures are presumably warmer. However, faster growth rates of juvenile fir than spruce may be short‐lived if the effects of warming on adult fir growth are more deleterious than the effects on spruce growth (Kelsey et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subalpine zone of southern Colorado is characterized by a cool and moist climate (Romme et al ). Average annual temperatures range from 1.3° (northern plots) to 2.2°C (southern plots; 1970–2017, PRISM Climate Group ) and temperatures have increased by about 1°C over the past three decades (1975–2012; Kelsey et al ). Total mean annual precipitation ranges spatially from 510–1,300 mm with about 65% of precipitation falling as snow from October–April.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our results concur with the observed lack of a CO 2 -induced growth response in mature natural stands illustrated via manipulative experiment (Körner et al, 2005), inventories (Chen, Luo, Reich, Searle, & Biswas, 2016) and tree rings (Camarero et al, 2015;Gedalof & Berg, 2010;Groenendijk et al, 2015;Reed, Ballantyne, Cooper Leila, & Sala, 2018;van der Sleen et al, 2014). Other recent large-scale analyses reveal a high degree of heterogeneity in growth responses to elevated CO 2 (Charney, D., Babst, F., Poulter, B., Record, S., Trouet, V., M., Frank, D., Evans, M., E., Evans, M., E., Evans, M., E., Evans, M., & E. K., 2016; Girardin et al, 2016;Kelsey, Redmond, Barger, & Neff, 2018;Tei et al, 2017). This, as well as fundamental theory on the limits to tree growth, indicates that a CO 2 fertilization effect is unlikely to be ubiquitous and that making such an assumption might lead to inappropriate predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discovery of a potential growth divergence based on aspect led us to the research question addressed in this study: What is the potential for differential responses in radial growth and climate/growth relationships over time between groupings of alpine larch trees exposed to identical macroenvironmental conditions but different microenvironmental conditions related to aspect? The leading drivers of microenvironmental differences in relation to aspect are solar radiation and associated soil moisture fluctuations (Kelsey et al 2017). Southern aspects in the northern hemisphere and northern aspects in the southern hemisphere generally experience drier conditions because of longer and more intense exposure to incoming solar radiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Southern aspects in the northern hemisphere and northern aspects in the southern hemisphere generally experience drier conditions because of longer and more intense exposure to incoming solar radiation. In the southwestern Colorado Rocky Mountains, Kelsey et al (2017) identified negative trends in radial growth for subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa [Hook.] Nutt.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%