“…However, our results concur with the observed lack of a CO 2 -induced growth response in mature natural stands illustrated via manipulative experiment (Körner et al, 2005), inventories (Chen, Luo, Reich, Searle, & Biswas, 2016) and tree rings (Camarero et al, 2015;Gedalof & Berg, 2010;Groenendijk et al, 2015;Reed, Ballantyne, Cooper Leila, & Sala, 2018;van der Sleen et al, 2014). Other recent large-scale analyses reveal a high degree of heterogeneity in growth responses to elevated CO 2 (Charney, D., Babst, F., Poulter, B., Record, S., Trouet, V., M., Frank, D., Evans, M., E., Evans, M., E., Evans, M., E., Evans, M., & E. K., 2016; Girardin et al, 2016;Kelsey, Redmond, Barger, & Neff, 2018;Tei et al, 2017). This, as well as fundamental theory on the limits to tree growth, indicates that a CO 2 fertilization effect is unlikely to be ubiquitous and that making such an assumption might lead to inappropriate predictions.…”