1960
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.part.6498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speciation and evolution of the pygmy mice, genus Baiomys

Abstract: The largest single collection of pygmy mice is in the University of Kansas Museum of Natural History, and, unless otherwise indicated, specimens cited in the taxonomic accounts beyond are there.I am indebted to the following named institutions and persons for making specimens available for study:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0
6

Year Published

1970
1970
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
14
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons between S. a. vulcani and S. a. planifrons may assess subspecific differences; however, these two samples differ more in the orofacial measurements (Mahalanobis D = 3.28) than do found within taxa between wild-caught and laboratory-bred individuals in any measurement. No sexual dimorphism was found in any ofthese measurements, a finding consistent with previous studies of these Sigmodon (Baker, 1969) and other sigmodontine rodents (Hooper, 1952;Pearson, 1958;Packard, 1960;Voss, 1988). All individuals are 100 days of age or older; while growth rates tend to be low in adults older than 100 days of age, Sigmodon continues growing until approximately 250 days of age (Baker and Shump, 1978), so there may be agerelated variation within these samples.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Comparisons between S. a. vulcani and S. a. planifrons may assess subspecific differences; however, these two samples differ more in the orofacial measurements (Mahalanobis D = 3.28) than do found within taxa between wild-caught and laboratory-bred individuals in any measurement. No sexual dimorphism was found in any ofthese measurements, a finding consistent with previous studies of these Sigmodon (Baker, 1969) and other sigmodontine rodents (Hooper, 1952;Pearson, 1958;Packard, 1960;Voss, 1988). All individuals are 100 days of age or older; while growth rates tend to be low in adults older than 100 days of age, Sigmodon continues growing until approximately 250 days of age (Baker and Shump, 1978), so there may be agerelated variation within these samples.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…1 found within taxa between wild-caught and laboratory-bred individuals in any measurement. No sexual dimorphism was found in any ofthese measurements, a finding consistent with previous studies of these Sigmodon (Baker, 1969) and other sigmodontine rodents (Hooper, 1952;Pearson, 1958;Packard, 1960;Voss, 1988). All individuals are 100 days of age or older; while growth rates tend to be low in adults older than 100 days of age, Sigmodon continues growing until approximately 250 days of age (Baker and Shump, 1978), so there may be agerelated variation within these samples.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Para facilitar y en su caso asegurar la determinación correcta de los integrantes de este grupo, se tomaron en cuenta los caracteres diagnósticos que permiten reconocer fácilmente a las especies, enfatizando aquéllos estados del carácter que reflejan las poblaciones de las especies que habitan la entidad. Por tanto, los atributos de los roedores considerados en el presente trabajo se derivaron a partir de los datos de las revisiones taxonómicas de las familias Geomyidae (Merriam 1895), Sciuridae (Nelson 1899;Howell 1938), de los trabajos de algunos miembros de los géneros Perognathus (Osgood 1900), Oryzomys (Merriam 1901a;Goldman 1918;Carleton y Arroyo-Cabrales 2009), Peromyscus (Osgood 1909), Neotoma (Goldman 1910;Hall y Genoways 1970), Reithrodontomys (Howell 1914;Hooper 1952), Orthogeomys (Nelson y Goldman 1930), Thomomys (Nelson y Goldman 1934), Nelsonia (Hooper 1954), Baiomys (Packard 1960), Pappogeomys (Russell 1968), Spermophilus (Helgen et al 2009), de la especie Sciurus aureogaster (Musser 1968), notas sobre faunas locales (Allen 1906;Hooper 1955;Musser 1969;Genoways y Jones 1969, 1973, estudios faunísticos regionales (Carleton 1977), monografías (Hall 1981; Villa-Ramírez y Cervantes 2003), y de guías de campo (Ceballos y Miranda 1986.…”
Section: Materials Y Métodosunclassified