Variation in Developmental Constraints in Sigmodon

Abstract

Developmental constraints can be interpreted as factors of developmental origin responsible for covariation among measured variables. Several hypotheses have been proposed to link the possession of such constraints to subsequent evolution. Using confirmatory factor analysis, we compare developmental factors across selected taxa of cotton rats, genus Sigmodon. Three factors explain well the covariation among orofacial measurements: (1) responses to body size variation, (1) coordinated growth of traits of the occluding-tooth complex, and (3) responses to musculoskeletal interactions. Sigmodon taxa share these factors, but differ in the variance-covariance matrix of factors, and the unique variances of individual traits. Patterns of covariation among measurements of the neurocranial complex reflect responses to body size variation, and perhaps also responses to fetal brain growth. While there are no significant differences across taxa in factorpattern, variance-covariance matrix of factors, or unique variance of measured neurocranial variables, the neurocranium is only weakly constrained. We doubt that even the relatively stronger developmental constraints on the orofacial complex would prevent evolutionary divergence because differences in the variances and covariances of factors, and in levels of unique variance of individual traits can provide different opportunities for selection to act in different Sigmodon taxa.

Phenotypic covariance structure in tamarins (genusSaguinus): a comparison of variation patterns using matrix correlation and common principal component analysis

“…General patterns of mammalian cranial growth and development, such as disjunction of the neural and somatic growth systems, may result in common patterns of morphological integration across mammals-patterns which have been found in various species of primates and rats (Cheverud, 1982(Cheverud, , 1995Zelditch, 1988;Zelditch and Carmichael, 1989;Zelditch et al, 1990). The existence of a common pattern of morphological integration between the tamarin species is closely linked to the presence of common correlation patterns, so our detection of strong correlations between the tamarin species is not surprising.…”

Diversity trends and their ontogenetic basis: an exploration of allometric disparity in rodents

“…Further, because functional and developmental constraints are expressed in patterns of integration (e.g. Zelditch et al 1990), disparity will reflect the possibilities that remain for the functional or developmental differentiation of integrated phenotypes. Our results indicate both muroids and hystricognaths possess similar abilities to evolve in different directions of phenotypic space.…”

Comparing the strength of modular signal, and evaluating alternative modular hypotheses, using covariance ratio effect sizes with morphometric data

“…Another key challenge in the study of modularity is identifying which sets of traits represent anatomical modules (Zelditch et al. ; Hallgrimsson et al. ).…”