2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speciation across mountains: Phylogenomics, species delimitation and taxonomy of the Liolaemus leopardinus clade (Squamata, Liolaemidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Abdala et al [22] noted that from 1998 to 2007 an average of five new species of Liolaemus were described annually, but from 2008 to date, 66 new species have been described for an average of 6.5 new Liolaemus per year. The principal evidence used in support of these taxa has been morphological [1, 6, 15, 16, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94], molecular [14, 66, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99], morphological and molecular [5, 19, 100, 101, 102], morphological, molecular, and cytogenetic [18], and phylogenetic [2, 103]. This taxonomic research demonstrates that Liolaemus have morphological characters that are informative for the delimitation of species and that many of these characters are likely to be adaptive, allowing these lizards to exploit a wide range of habitats and macroenvironments, as expressed by the high species richness of the genus [104].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdala et al [22] noted that from 1998 to 2007 an average of five new species of Liolaemus were described annually, but from 2008 to date, 66 new species have been described for an average of 6.5 new Liolaemus per year. The principal evidence used in support of these taxa has been morphological [1, 6, 15, 16, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94], molecular [14, 66, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99], morphological and molecular [5, 19, 100, 101, 102], morphological, molecular, and cytogenetic [18], and phylogenetic [2, 103]. This taxonomic research demonstrates that Liolaemus have morphological characters that are informative for the delimitation of species and that many of these characters are likely to be adaptive, allowing these lizards to exploit a wide range of habitats and macroenvironments, as expressed by the high species richness of the genus [104].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that some members of Liolaemus exhibit extensive levels of intraspecific variation, making diagnoses based on a single source of evidence unstable (e.g. coloration patterns, single-locus data; Breitman et al, 2013Breitman et al, , 2015Escudero et al, 2016;Esquerré et al, 2019). Further, a great number of species have been described based only on external morphological characters, not taking into account the extensive sexual and ontogenetic observed polymorphism, especially in the L. kingii group (see reviews in Breitman et al, 2013, and Avila et al, in press).…”
Section: Lineage Delimitation In the L Kingii Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear, meristic and head shape data have been used to delimit some Liolaemus species (e.g. Minoli et al, 2016;Esquerré et al, 2019) and, in some cases, these characters proved to be good estimators. In this study, however, the partial level of resolution of these are relevant if one considers that Liolaemus, in general, has been characterized by morphological stasis, with many species sharing what appears to be a conserved morphology (Olave et al, 2017(Olave et al, , 2018Esquerré et al, 2019;Villamil et al, 2019).…”
Section: Lineage Delimitation In the L Kingii Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some authors have recently posited that hybridization may be one of the factors responsible for generating the exceptional diversity within this clade, particularly when compared to its sister clade Phymaturus that only has 48 species (Olave et al, 2018(Olave et al, , 2020Morando et al, 2020). Indeed, several studies have detected or suggested hybridization in disparate Liolaemus groups including the lineomaculatus series (Breitman et al, 2011) and leopardinus clade (Esquerré et al, 2019), the darwinii, kriegi, and petrophilus complexes (Morando et al, 2004;Feltrin, 2013;Medina et al, 2014), and the chiliensis and fitzingerii groups (Avila et al, 2006;Grummer et al, 2018;Araya-Donoso et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%