Special Symposium, Collective Vigilantism in Global Comparative Perspective Mechanics of Impunity: Vigilantism and State-Building in Indonesia

Abstract

Existing scholarship on vigilantism focuses on explaining factors that push citizens into the streets to take the law into their own hands. This article complements these theories by examining fear of reprisals that can keep vigilantes off the streets. It argues that vigilantism becomes rife when vigilantes find a systematic way to collude with state officials to obtain impunity. Qualitative data from Indonesia illustrate how street-level policemen grant selective impunity for vigilantism to gain public support for dispensing their more pressing duties. Contrary to conventional wisdom that links state-building to a decline in vigilantism, analysis of a sub-national dataset of 33,262 victims of vigilantism in Indonesia shows that a rapid expansion of the state’s coercive presence is associated with higher levels of vigilante violence.

Fear of terrorist attacks and psychological distress in Sub-Saharan Africa: moderated mediation model

“…In their quest to unravel these negative trends, some experts have posited that insufficient basic needs, unemployment and lack of economic opportunities make Africa a fertile destination for criminal organizations (Boti Phiri, 2022;UN, 2023a). Based on this assertion, some scholars have suggested that countries ought to build highly responsive criminal intelligence institutions (Piza and Connealy, 2022;Vicenov a, 2020), whereas others have highlighted the need for collective vigilance by community members in any given state (Sana, 2023;Trasberg, 2023). Therefore, this study is driven by these specific research questions:…”

State Absence, Vengeance, and the Logic of Vigilantism in Guatemala

“…These cases are often consistent patterns of behavior that challenge the state’s monopoly on the use of force. That citizens are willing to take the law “into their own hands” raises concerns about a lack of procedural justice (Tyler, 1994), vigilante impunity (Jaffrey, 2019), and tit-for-tat violent escalation. Thus, vigilantism has implications for the formation of order, the quality of governance, and the politics of policing across the world.…”