The author revisits autoethnographic work in order to examine how she unwittingly incorporated damage-centered (Tuck 2009) research approaches that reproduce settler colonial understandings of marginalized communities. The paper examines the reproduction of settler colonial knowledge in ethnographic research by unearthing the inherent surveillance that partly constitutes settler colonial subjectivities in the United States. Finally, the author discusses unsettling methodological approaches as a way to disrupt damage-centered practices in ethnographic research. In the author's data collection at the U.S./Mexico border, the deeply introspective method of unsettling reflexivity-the ways we might (both indigenous and non-indigenous scholars) reproduce settler colonialism-helps challenge colonial-blind knowledge production, which has affected our understanding of colonial histories and often shaped the research process. [decolonial methods, Indigenous methodologies, settler colonialism, surveillance, colonial-blind epistemology]
Introduction: Critical Ethnography Research as Intervention to the Colonial ProjectAs researchers committed to decolonial research in education, we must be vigilant of the ways we might unintentionally reproduce colonialist regimes of knowledge, which in the United States are organized by an ongoing settler colonial project. Characterized in how European colonizers came to stay and maintain a nation-building project, settler colonialism depends on the dispossession of indigenous peoples from their land and cultures and requires supportive knowledge systems and political and legal institutions to help found and maintain settler societies (Wolfe 2006). Indeed, if we look at the history between researchers and indigenous peoples, we know the price paid by indigenous communities has been great, creating a great mistrust of research in general within indigenous communities (Smith 1999;Trask 1991). As many have pointed out, researchparticularly anthropology-has been an extension