2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10772-012-9146-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speaker-independent ASR for Modern Standard Arabic: effect of regional accents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant effects of speech quality for syntactic and semantic interpretation accuracy are consistent with previous research findings, demonstrating that speech recognition technology is dependent on audible clarity in order to consistently provide accurate responses (Rohlfing et al, 2020;Luger & Sellen, 2016). The significant effect of speaker accent for semantic interpretation accuracy is consistent with previous research analyzing differences in software response accuracy relating to participant accents (Wilson et al, 2017;Palancia et al, 2019), but is contrary to accent studies examining ASR performances of speech software (Dichristofano et al, 2022;Droua-Hamdani et al, 2012). The final main effect of speech rate was not significant for either WER or confidence scores, contradicting previous findings suggesting that speaking at moderate speech rates compared to fast and slow rates results in higher user satisfaction due to greater software response accuracy (Choi et al, 2020, Christenson, 2020.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The significant effects of speech quality for syntactic and semantic interpretation accuracy are consistent with previous research findings, demonstrating that speech recognition technology is dependent on audible clarity in order to consistently provide accurate responses (Rohlfing et al, 2020;Luger & Sellen, 2016). The significant effect of speaker accent for semantic interpretation accuracy is consistent with previous research analyzing differences in software response accuracy relating to participant accents (Wilson et al, 2017;Palancia et al, 2019), but is contrary to accent studies examining ASR performances of speech software (Dichristofano et al, 2022;Droua-Hamdani et al, 2012). The final main effect of speech rate was not significant for either WER or confidence scores, contradicting previous findings suggesting that speaking at moderate speech rates compared to fast and slow rates results in higher user satisfaction due to greater software response accuracy (Choi et al, 2020, Christenson, 2020.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…At present, the most popular and successful speech recognition systems use Hidden Markov Models (HMM) [23][24][25][26] in the acoustic modeling. HMM is used to train the acoustic models of sixty one phonemes along with a model of silence (sil).…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This greatly enhances the performance speech recognizers. The derivatives of the features are calculated through the use of regression formula [23].…”
Section: Frequency Partitioning and Wavelet Based Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berdasarkan pemaparan tersebut, sintaksis sebagai cabang ilmu linguistik yang membahas penataan dan pengaturan kata-kata, serta merupakan subsistem gramatika yang berfokus pada struktur juga turut mengalami perkembangan seiring perkembangan linguistik. Selain membawa pengaruh terhadap sintaksis, perkembangan linguistik normalnya berpengaruh juga terhadap perkembangan bahasa yang menjadi objeknya, termasuk bahasa Arab sebagai salah satu bahasa yang cukup khas dengan konsep tata bahasanya (Hamdani, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Bahasa Arab sendiri memiliki klasifikasi berdasarkan penggunaannya. Ghania Droua dalam Hamdani (2012) menyebutkan bahwa bahasa Arab terdiri dari Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) dan Colloquial Arabic (CA). Menurut penjelasannya, MSA adalah bahasa Arab yang digunakan di ruang-ruang resmi, seperti institusi pendidikan, institusi media, dan komunikasi formal pada umumnya, sedangkan CA digunakan dalam komunikasi sehari-hari.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified