2014
DOI: 10.5812/ijb.10268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spawning Latency Period in Hormonal Induced Reproduction of Snow trout (Schizothorax zarudnyi (Nikolskii, 1897))

Abstract: Background: The breeding performance is an important parameter to evaluate the breeding success in captivity conditions. The optimum dose of hormone in combination with latency period is desirable for getting best breeding performance in fish. Objectives: The objective of the study was to find the spawning latency period in the hormonal induced reproduction of Snow trout with two inducers (Ovaprim and hCG) separately and in combination. Materials and Methods: The fish spawners were randomly divided into five g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Irrespective of the dosage of Ovatide applied in different treatments, the time interval between the first hormonal injection of Ovatide extract and ovulation (latency period or response time) varied between 21 and 22 h and occurred within a temperature range of 26 -28 °C. The longtime of latency was attributed to lack of synchronization in achievement of readiness of spawning by the fish (Rahdari et al, 2014). Tan-Fermin and Emata (1993) recorded a latency period of 12-16 h when Clarias gariepinus and Clarias macrocephalus were induced to breed using pituitary and ovaprim which is lower than the present findings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Irrespective of the dosage of Ovatide applied in different treatments, the time interval between the first hormonal injection of Ovatide extract and ovulation (latency period or response time) varied between 21 and 22 h and occurred within a temperature range of 26 -28 °C. The longtime of latency was attributed to lack of synchronization in achievement of readiness of spawning by the fish (Rahdari et al, 2014). Tan-Fermin and Emata (1993) recorded a latency period of 12-16 h when Clarias gariepinus and Clarias macrocephalus were induced to breed using pituitary and ovaprim which is lower than the present findings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…The latency time (the time interval between the second injection and ovulation) varied from 24.7 ± 2.53 h to 36.6 ± 2.33 h. This period was much longer than the period reported by Su et al (2019). It could be related to water temperature, or to shorter latency periods in higher temperature conditions (Rahdari et al, 2014), or to the oocyte diameter of the females (Barry & Fast, 1988). The present study showed that the fertilization and hatching rates were significantly different among different doses of injection of LHRH-A2 (P < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Indeed, Ovaprim™ topical gill induction had a negative relation to spawning latency periods in the present study where the highest dose induced the shortest latency (4.50 µL/g female and 2.25 µL/g male dosage), showing that it is an effective technique. Spawning induction via exogenous hormone therapy at an optimal dose also shortens the time of spawning latency in striped snakehead (Channa striata) (Marimuthu et al, 2007), snow trout (Schizothorax zarudnyi) (Rahdari et al, 2014), and Labeo rohita (Khan et al, 2006). Ovaprim™ application to the gills affected total fecundity, we suggest that T3 (3.00 µL/g female and 1.50 µL/g male dosage) is the optimal dose for efficacy as there was no difference between this and the highest test dose.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%