2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18095007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal Changes of Ecosystem Service Value Determined by National Land Space Pattern Change: A Case Study of Fengdu County in The Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China

Abstract: Exploring the spatiotemporal change characteristics of ecosystem service value (ESV) under the influence of national land space pattern (NLSP) changes is of great significance for promoting the rational use of land resources and the optimization of ecosystems. In this study, Fengdu County in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area was selected as a case study. We analyzed the changes in NLSP using land use data from 1990, 2000, 2010 and 2018. Then, we used the equivalent factor method and exploratory spatial data anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ESV is an important indicator to measure ES supply capacity [51]. Referring to the research of Zhang et al [52], we investigated land use type and the ESV per unit area as the bases to identify the source and sink landscape of ESs in the study area. The results show that paddy fields, dry land, forest, grassland, water, and unused land are source landscapes, whereas urban land and rural residential areas are sink landscapes (SLs).…”
Section: Land Use Optimization Framework Based On the Source-sink Landscape Of Essmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…ESV is an important indicator to measure ES supply capacity [51]. Referring to the research of Zhang et al [52], we investigated land use type and the ESV per unit area as the bases to identify the source and sink landscape of ESs in the study area. The results show that paddy fields, dry land, forest, grassland, water, and unused land are source landscapes, whereas urban land and rural residential areas are sink landscapes (SLs).…”
Section: Land Use Optimization Framework Based On the Source-sink Landscape Of Essmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between these optimization processes indicates that the optimization of the areas of land use types is determined by the spatial constraint of the spatial land use optimization, whereas the spatial land use optimization is determined by the quantity constraint imposed by the optimization of land use type area [55] (Figure 3). The areal proportion of various source and sink landscapes directly determines the total regional ESV [52,56]. Therefore, to optimize land use for ESs, and according to the areas of various land use types, regional land resources need to be allocated to land use types with higher ESVs per unit area under constraint conditions.…”
Section: Land Use Optimization Framework Based On the Source-sink Landscape Of Essmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Humans are constantly changing ecosystems to obtain more ecosystem services [ 1 , 2 ] and production materials [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]; among these outputs, food provision services not only support human survival and reproduction [ 6 , 7 ], but also provide basic material conditions for social and economic development [ 8 , 9 , 10 ]. However, the quantity of food provision services acquired by humans is not only affected by natural conditions, because stakeholders also have an obvious influence on the quantity and structure of food provision services [ 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%