Spatiotemporal access to emergency medical services in Wuhan, China: accounting for scene and transport time intervals

Abstract

Background Access as a primary indicator of Emergency Medical Service (EMS) efficiency has been widely studied over the last few decades. Most previous studies considered one-way trips, either getting ambulances to patients or transporting patients to hospitals. This research assesses spatiotemporal access to EMS at the shequ (the smallest administrative unit) level in Wuhan, China, attempting to fill a gap in literature by considering and comparing both trips in the evaluation of EMS access. Methods Two spatiotemporal access measures are adopted here: the proximity-based travel time obtained from online map services and the enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E-2SFCA) which is a gravity-based model. First, the travel time is calculated for the two trips involved in one EMS journey: one is from the nearest EMS station to the scene (i.e. scene time interval (STI)) and the other is from the scene to the nearest hospital (i.e. transport time interval (TTI)). Then, the predicted travel time is incorporated into the E-2SFCA model to calculate the access measure considering the availability of the service provider as well as the population in need. For both access measures, the calculation is implemented for peak hours and off-peak hours. Results Both methods showed a marked decrease in EMS access during peak traffic hours, and differences in spatial patterns of ambulance and hospital access. About 73.9% of shequs can receive an ambulance or get to the nearest hospital within 10 min during off-peak periods, and this proportion decreases to about 45.5% for peak periods. Most shequs with good ambulance access but poor hospital access are in the south of the study area. In general, the central areas have better ambulance, hospital and overall access than peripheral areas, particularly during off-peak periods. Conclusions In addition to the impact of peak traffic periods on EMS access, we found that good ambulance access does not necessarily guarantee good hospital access nor the overall access, and vice versa.

Establishment of hospital resilience framework in urban China: insight from Wuhan City

“…The background of globalization has provided great convenience for the spread of epidemics and pose a severe test for urban safety. Emergency medical facilities, as one of the most effective measures for public health emergencies, are necessary to be prepared (Luo et al, 2020 ). With the help of Emergency medical facilities and the implementation of strict epidemic prevention policies and measures, the epidemic in Wuhan has been effectively controlled.…”

Will multi-industry supply chains' resilience under the impact of COVID-19 pandemic be different? A perspective from China's highway freight transport

“…Wuhan, the capital of Hubei province, is one of China'snine national central cities. It is the most populous ( Wang et al, 2021 ) and the largest city ( Luo et al, 2020 ) in central China. In December 2019, COVID-19 was discovered in Wuhan ( Awadasseid et al, 2021 ) and in other parts of the world no longer after.…”

Assessing Trauma Center Accessibility for Healthcare Equity Using an Anti-Covering Approach

“…The disparities in access to emergency health care service is epidemic worldwide; as a result, much research has assessed the different levels of accessibility to emergency uninsured medical service facilities in Ghana, Africa [24]; Dhaka, Bangladesh [25]; Slovakia [26]; Slovenia [27]; Bavaria, Germany [28]; Milan, Italy [29]; Melbourne, Australia [30]; and Hanoi, Vietnam [31]. Luo et al [8] measured the access to EMS in Wuhan, China by exploring the differences between what the literature states and the actual trip time from an EMS station to the accident scene and from the accident scene to the nearest hospital. They found differences in accessibility to EMS in different regions and in different time windows (off-peak and peak hours) to be useful information for evidence-based health care planning.…”

“…Depending on the type of accident or illness, the time patients have to receive appropriate treatment to survive without post-disorders differs. For example, certain conditions, such as heart attack or cerebral hemorrhage, must be treated by a specialist within one hour in order for patients to recover without side effects [8][9][10][11]. The faster the response to patients with such symptoms as severe bleeding, complex fractures, and amputations, the lower the likelihood of death or disability [12,13].…”