2021
DOI: 10.5154/r.inagbi.2021.02.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatio-temporal variation of reference evapotranspiration from empirical methods in Chihuahua, Mexico

Abstract: <strong>Introduction:</strong> Evapotranspiration is key in the management of arid agricultural areas. In Chihuahua, the volume of irrigation water is based on reference evapotranspiration (ET<sub>o</sub>) calculated with empirical methods and extrapolated to the cropped area, which is inaccurate. The alternative is to calculate ET<sub>o</sub> variation by spatial interpolation.</br> <strong>Objective:</strong> To analyze the spatio-temporal variation of ET… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, considering the month with the minimum ET 0 (February) and the PM method, HS yielded an ET 0 12.8% higher vs. PM; BC, 6.8% higher; and PM_NP, 14.2% higher. It is observed that HS and BC underestimate ET 0 over most of the study period, consistent with the findings reported by some authors for an agroclimatic region similar to the study area [ 71 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, considering the month with the minimum ET 0 (February) and the PM method, HS yielded an ET 0 12.8% higher vs. PM; BC, 6.8% higher; and PM_NP, 14.2% higher. It is observed that HS and BC underestimate ET 0 over most of the study period, consistent with the findings reported by some authors for an agroclimatic region similar to the study area [ 71 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, MBE is negative in the three periods, pointing to an underestimation with the HS _NP method. Some authors report this same ET 0 underestimation effect in semi-arid regions during the winter–summer period [ 27 , 71 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, considering the month with the minimum ET 0 (February) and the PM method, HS yielded an ET 0 12.8% higher vs. PM; BC, 6.8% higher; and PM_NP, 14.2% higher. It is observed that HS and BC underestimate ET 0 over most of the study period, consistent with the findings reported by some authors for an agroclimatic region similar to the study area [71]. However, when considering total ET 0 (whole study period) and the PM method, HS recorded an ET 0 value 5.5% lower vs. PM; BC, a value 15.6% lower; and PM_NP, 10.6% higher; therefore, HS was the equation that yielded values closest to the PM method.…”
Section: Comparison Of Et 0 Estimated By Empirical Equations Versus T...supporting
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, MBE is negative in the three periods, pointing to an underestimation with the HS _NP method. Some authors report this same ET 0 underestimation effect in semi-arid regions during the winter-summer period [27,71]. The 5-day mean ET 0 estimate recorded the best values in most statistical parameters relative to the mean daily ET 0 .…”
Section: Comparison Of Estimated Et 0 With Observed (Aws) Versus Esti...mentioning
confidence: 76%