2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatio-temporal pattern of neuronal differentiation in the Drosophila visual system: A user’s guide to the dynamic morphology of the developing optic lobe

Abstract: Visual information processing in animals with large image forming eyes is carried out in highly structured retinotopically ordered neuropils. Visual neuropils in Drosophila form the optic lobe, which consists of four serially arranged major subdivisions; the lamina, medulla, lobula and lobula plate; the latter three of these are further subdivided into multiple layers. The visual neuropils are formed by more than 100 different cell types, distributed and interconnected in an invariant highly regular pattern. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference in growth rate is further maintained though time (96 and 102 hAEL), and while Repo > SbmRNAi larvae spend almost 24 extra hours eating and growing (120 hAEL), their brain never reaches the final control size ( Figures 3 C and S6 A). Observations of the anatomical features ( Dearborn and Kunes, 2004 , Ngo et al., 2017 ) of the brain of the Sbm-knockdown larvae through these time points show that brain development is delayed compared to controls ( Figure 4 A). This is also highlighted by the differences in the number of dividing cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This difference in growth rate is further maintained though time (96 and 102 hAEL), and while Repo > SbmRNAi larvae spend almost 24 extra hours eating and growing (120 hAEL), their brain never reaches the final control size ( Figures 3 C and S6 A). Observations of the anatomical features ( Dearborn and Kunes, 2004 , Ngo et al., 2017 ) of the brain of the Sbm-knockdown larvae through these time points show that brain development is delayed compared to controls ( Figure 4 A). This is also highlighted by the differences in the number of dividing cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…pausing at the distal border of the medulla, sending thin filopodia exploring prospective layer M3 After 47% pupation, DRA.R8 cell growth cone in non-DRA R8 recipient layer began to thicken, while simultaneously growing towards the deeper R7 recipient layer. Such behavior was never observed in non-DRA R8 cells, which still elongated after reaching the non-DRA R8 recipient layer, most likely via a passive process as the medulla thickens 42,51,52 . The speed and dynamics of the thickened DRA.R8 process descending towards M6 suggest it results from an active process.…”
Section: Sequential Targeting Of Drar7 and Drar8 Photoreceptor Termmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A proneuronal wave sequentially converts single rows of neuroepithelial cells into neuroblasts, the Drosophila neural stem cells, until the entire OPC is consumed (Egger et al, 2007). The medulla is thus sequentially produced, similarly and concomitantly to the retina where single rows of ommatidia are sequentially added in the eye disc at the morphogenetic furrow (Hofbauer and Campos-Ortega, 1990;Ngo et al, 2017;Ready et al, 1976). Once specified, medulla neuroblasts sequentially express a series of transcription factors that will command the fate of the neurons produced during each temporal window (Holguera and Desplan, 2018;Li et al, 2013;Suzuki et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%