1996
DOI: 10.1016/0379-6779(96)80087-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatially resolved electron tunneling spectroscopy on single crystalline Rb3C60

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 to 5 . 2 meV corresponding to a reduced energy gap ratio 2¢ /kB Tc between two and four, while dI /dV follows nonetheless the BCS expression, corrected by the usual broadening with the Dynes approach [142,143]. Moreover, this latter tunnelling experiment shows that slight variations in the DOS exist even on the molecular scale [143].…”
Section: Downloaded By [Stanford University Libraries] At 10:30 06 Ocmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 to 5 . 2 meV corresponding to a reduced energy gap ratio 2¢ /kB Tc between two and four, while dI /dV follows nonetheless the BCS expression, corrected by the usual broadening with the Dynes approach [142,143]. Moreover, this latter tunnelling experiment shows that slight variations in the DOS exist even on the molecular scale [143].…”
Section: Downloaded By [Stanford University Libraries] At 10:30 06 Ocmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…More recent scanning microscopy tunnelling investigations Rb3C60 single crystals also reveal a spatial variation in the superconducting energy gap, which is attributed to a varying stoichiometry on a scale of 50 nm [143].…”
Section: Fullerenes and Carbon Derivatives 267mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…An early measurement of ∆ was performed using point contact tunneling in STM, giving 2∆/T c = 5.3 for Rb 3 C 60 (Zhang et al, 1991b). Later STM measurements on single crystals have given reduced gaps 2∆/T c = 5.4 (Jess et al, 1994) and 2∆/T c = 2.0 − 4.0 (Jess et al, 1996). The variations in 2∆/T c were ascribed to variations in the local stoichiometry at the tip position.…”
Section: B Superconductivity Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More surface-sensitive experimental techniques, on the other hand, like tunneling and photoelectron spectroscopy, produce results that differ considerably among each other. Tunneling spectroscopy studies [11,[16][17][18][19], for example, yield values for the reduced gap ranging from 2 to 5, probably depending on sample preparation and handling. One problem with these tunneling measurements is that none of them were carried out in ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) conditions, so that the actual state of the surface is unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%