2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-017-1281-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatialization of Brazilian pig production: relationship between productive, physical, environmental, and socio-economic variables

Abstract: Brazilian pig production spans over a large territory encompassing regions of different climatic and socio-economic realities. Production, physical, socio-economic, and environmental data were used to characterize pig production in the country. Multivariate analysis evaluated indices including number productivity, production levels, and income from pigs, together with the average area of pig farm and socio-economic variables such as municipal human development index, technical guidance received from agricultur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the differences found in a heterogeneous environment, with climate, specific physical and socioeconomic components of each region (Lopes et al, 2012), can affect breeds' distribution. Although animal production had an important relationship with the environment, this factor was not always taken into account by farmers (Silva et al, 2017). Factors such as climate, geomorphology, management, nutrition, health, socioeconomic variables and technology must be better understood so that that production can be successful (Herrero et al, 2010;Lopes et al, 2012;McManus et al, 2014).…”
Section: Arqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the differences found in a heterogeneous environment, with climate, specific physical and socioeconomic components of each region (Lopes et al, 2012), can affect breeds' distribution. Although animal production had an important relationship with the environment, this factor was not always taken into account by farmers (Silva et al, 2017). Factors such as climate, geomorphology, management, nutrition, health, socioeconomic variables and technology must be better understood so that that production can be successful (Herrero et al, 2010;Lopes et al, 2012;McManus et al, 2014).…”
Section: Arqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 These considerations allow the use of homeopathic combinations as non-prescription therapy or as a feed additive to improve the growth performance of production animals. 15…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 These considerations allow the use of homeopathic combinations as non-prescription therapy or as a feed additive to improve the growth performance of production animals. 15 Homeopathic products have been used in pig production for the prevention of reproductive diseases, presenting positive results, such as an increase in folliculogenesis in sows, 16 with greater number of births and decreased time for a return to estrus 17 and, in males, improvement in sperm motility and vigor 48 to 72 hours after semen collec-tion. 18 HP can be used as homeoprophylaxis in the prevention of infectious disease symptoms, being reported as efficient in the prevention of intestinal diseases and in reduction of post-weaning stress in piglets from 7 to 28 days of age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in the northern region, pig farming did not show the same technological improvement and was characterized by subsistence production (self-consumption) or as a complementary source of income through regular or sporadic marketing in local consumer markets. In the State of Pará, the expansion of cattle farming has coincided with a sharp decline in the number of pig farms, which has practically not evolved over the years, being restricted to small properties (Silva et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%