these figures, we can see that the return loss is better than 19.5 dB, the gain is between 8.1 and 9.36 dB, and the axial ratio is between 2.30 and 4.41 dB.
CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSIONSWe are in the process of designing an economical electronicallyscanned antenna array with quasi-hemispheric coverage for Inmarsat mobile communications. In this paper, we have presented the design of an electromagnetically-coupled patch antenna with circular polarization for such an array application. The Ensemble CAD tool has been used to simulate the antenna. Compared with similar antennas reported, this antenna covers a wider bandwidth from 1.525 to 1.661 GHz. We have chosen a simpler feeding structure in order to save the otherwise limited space for the beam-forming networks. Further, the feeding circuit and antenna are on the same side of the ground plane, which in the array situation leaves the volume underneath the antenna array for the power predivider, the duplexer, and the LNA. The return loss is better than 19.5 dB, the gain is between 8.1 and 9.36 dB, and the axial ratio is between 2.30 and 4.41 dB.The highest axial ratio is about 1.7-dB higher than the highest axial ratio of Karmakar and Bialkowski's sample antenna, which is 2.7 dB at 1.525 GHz. This can lead to at most a 0.3-dB difference in the polarization-mismatch factor. The lowest gain in the operation band is also 0.5-dB lower. A possible reason for this is the different material used. In our case, the dielectric constant is higher and therefore the patch is slightly smaller. The loss tangent of our material might be higher as well. Both cases will cause the gain to decrease. We will consider using a different substrate in our future designs.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTPart of this work was finished in Laval University, Quebec, Canada. We would like to thank Prof. Michel Lecours and Mr. Claude Vergnolle for their help.
INTRODUCTIONThe boundary conditions which electric and magnetic fields have to satisfy on the surfaces of the object play an important role in electromagnetic scattering problems. One of these conditions is called as the impedance boundary condition (IBC), which gives a relation between tangential electric and magnetic field vectors on a given surface in terms of a coefficient called a surface impedance. Leontovich [1] and Wait [2] used this type of boundary condition firstly. The simplest form of the IBC is the standard impedance boundary condition (SIBC), which is used to model coatings and lossy dielectrics [3]. Generally, the surface impedance appearing in the SIBC is assumed to be independent of the location and associated with a constant coefficient [3,4]. On the other hand, when a more accurate SIBC is considered, the surface impedance may be a function of location [5]. For example, when the inhomogeneous earth surface composed of different parts, such as rocky soil, sand, forest, sea, and so forth, it is modeled by an SIBC. Scattering from canonical structures whose surface satisfy inhomogeneous SIBC have been proposed in [6 -8] and scattering from i...