2022
DOI: 10.1002/gj.4469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial variations of crustal thickness and Poisson's ratio in the northeastern region of India based on receiver function analysis

Abstract: Crustal configuration beneath the northeastern region of India has been investigated with the help of receiver function (RF) analysis of teleseismic earthquakes recorded by 19 broadband seismological stations. We adopted the H‐k stacking method to estimate crustal thickness and Poisson's ratio beneath each recording station. The study reveals a large variation in crustal thickness and Poisson's ratio which are correlated with the complex geology and tectonics of the region. The crust is observed to be thinner … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A high Poisson's ratio (0.277-0.293) is obtained for the Tidding Tuting Suture Zone (TTSZ) and western part of the LPC, indicating the presence of aqueous fluid/partial melt in the crust (Kundu et al, 2020). Shukla et al (2022) investigated the crustal configuration beneath northeast India based on receiver function analysis of teleseismic earthquakes recorded by 19 broadband seismological stations using H-k stacking method. The study reveals a large variation in crustal thickness and Poisson's ratio which are correlated with the complex geology and tectonics of the region.…”
Section: Himalayamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high Poisson's ratio (0.277-0.293) is obtained for the Tidding Tuting Suture Zone (TTSZ) and western part of the LPC, indicating the presence of aqueous fluid/partial melt in the crust (Kundu et al, 2020). Shukla et al (2022) investigated the crustal configuration beneath northeast India based on receiver function analysis of teleseismic earthquakes recorded by 19 broadband seismological stations using H-k stacking method. The study reveals a large variation in crustal thickness and Poisson's ratio which are correlated with the complex geology and tectonics of the region.…”
Section: Himalayamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, Shukla et al (2022) adopted H‐k stacking analysis of teleseismic RFs recorded at 19 stations and estimated crustal thickness and Poisson's ratio at each station. They have established a large variation in crustal thickness and Poisson's ratio which are correlated with the complex geology and tectonics of the region.…”
Section: Research Outputs Of Special Issue‐ Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geological map of Eastern Himalaya, Indo‐Myanmar orogenic belt, northern, Central Myanmar, and adjacent areas (modified after Mitchell et al, 2007; Searle et al, 2007; Y. R. Singh, Singh, Singh, et al, 2022). Locations of study area presented in the issue include 1/S2: Kundu and Hazarika (2022); 2/S2: Y. R. Singh, Singh, Singh, et al (2022); 3/S2: Rawat and Luirei (2022); 4/S2: Kayal et al (2022); 5/S2: Choudhury et al (2022); 6/S2: N. M. Sharma et al (2022); 7/S2: Goswami, Gogoi, et al (2022); 8/S2: Bikramaditya et al (2022); 9/S2: Goswami, Kalita, et al (2022); 10/S2: Joshi (2022); 11/S2: Jha and Sharma (2022); 12/S2: Shukla et al (2022); 13/S2: Khonglah et al (2022); 14/S2: Ali and Duarah (2022); 15/S2: Mohanty et al (2022); 16/S2: Chanu et al (2022); 17/S2: Majumdar, Gogoi, and Ghatak (2022); Majumdar, Gogoi, Ghatak, Saikia, et al (2022); 18/S2: Ding et al (2022); 19/S2: Ghose et al (2022); 20/S2: Hussain and Dey (2022); 21/S2: Ozukum et al (2022); 22/S2: Jamir et al (2022); 23/S2: Chaubey et al (2022); 24/S2: Bora, Borah, et al (2022); Bora, Mukherjee, et al (2022); 25/S2: Khuman and Ibotombi (2022); 26/S2: Y. R. Singh, Singh, Singh, et al (2022); 27/S2: Thokchom and Kshetrimayum (2021); 28/S2: Barman et al (2022); 29/S2: V. Sharma and Biswas (2022)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies suggest that subsurface tectonic are still active across the Shillong plateau, Mikir hills, Arakan-Yoma fold belt, Naga hills, parts of Bengal basin, lower-upper Brahmaputra valley along with the Mishmi hills of Himalayan foothills (Hazarika et al, 2022;Shukla et al, 2022). The available information about the thrust-faults is very limited and most of the information are available from the geographic information system (GIS) map, others field geological studies and very limited from seismic and other geoscientific data sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%