2008
DOI: 10.3354/meps07456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial variation of chlorophyll on estuarine mudflats determined by field-based remote sensing

Abstract: We present an approach to field-based remote sensing of the spatial variation of chlorophyll (as an index of microphytobenthic biomass) in intertidal soft sediments using digital colourinfrared imagery. Variation in amounts of chlorophyll a was quantified from small (cm) to large (100 m) scales within a single tidal cycle, using levels of replication and resolution that would be difficult to achieve using conventional sampling strategies. Eight scales of interest were selected: 100, 50, 2 and 1 m, and 40, 8, 4… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microphytobenthos is a community with a very variable spatial coverage at scales ranging from a few millimeters to kilometers (e.g. Seuront and Spilmont, 2002;Murphy et al, 2008;Davoult et al, 2009;Spilmont et al, 2011). It is therefore essential to have an overall evaluation of the community at the scale of the intertidal system since the description of its spatial structure is a prerequisite to understand processes (Murphy et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microphytobenthos is a community with a very variable spatial coverage at scales ranging from a few millimeters to kilometers (e.g. Seuront and Spilmont, 2002;Murphy et al, 2008;Davoult et al, 2009;Spilmont et al, 2011). It is therefore essential to have an overall evaluation of the community at the scale of the intertidal system since the description of its spatial structure is a prerequisite to understand processes (Murphy et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, however, little current information about multiple spatial scales of variation, for example from <1 m to km, for a suite of sedimentary variables that simultaneously includes physical properties, fauna and flora (but see Pinckney & Sandulli 1990, Azovsky 2002, Murphy et al 2008 for some components of sediment). Thus, it is not clear how best to sample to detect processes that operate at different spatial scales, nor to determine which scales show large variability that needs to be understood in order to identify ecological processes influencing sediments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, handling time is probably much greater for the SFB prey. In addition, macroinfaunal distribution, ab undance, and recruitment are largely cryptic and may be extremely variable (Beukema & de Vlas 1989, Beukema et al 1993, Zwarts & Wanink 1993, Honkoop et al 2006, Van der Wal et al 2008, Chapman et al 2010, whereas microphytobenthic patches are much more visible and, notwithstanding small-scale spatial variability (Murphy et al 2008, Chapman et al 2010, spatially predictable (e.g. following precise high tide isobaths, Méléder et al 2003b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%