2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial variability of soil compaction over a vineyard region in relation with soils and cultivation operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
38
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…To begin with, the soil profiles were described by the cropping profile method (Tavares Filho et al, 1999;Roger-Estrade et al, 2004;Lagacherie et al, 2006) to characterize the type and spatial organization of compact soil structures (morphologically homogeneous units, or MHUs, according to Neves et al (2003)). The analysis was performed in three trenches (1.0 x 1.0 x 1.5 m) in each of the three areas (F, NT and PD), at a randomly selected location, with a distance of 100 m between the trenches, which were arranged along the slope (one in the highest part, with least inclination; a second in the middle of the area, with average inclination; and a third in the lowest area, with greatest inclination).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To begin with, the soil profiles were described by the cropping profile method (Tavares Filho et al, 1999;Roger-Estrade et al, 2004;Lagacherie et al, 2006) to characterize the type and spatial organization of compact soil structures (morphologically homogeneous units, or MHUs, according to Neves et al (2003)). The analysis was performed in three trenches (1.0 x 1.0 x 1.5 m) in each of the three areas (F, NT and PD), at a randomly selected location, with a distance of 100 m between the trenches, which were arranged along the slope (one in the highest part, with least inclination; a second in the middle of the area, with average inclination; and a third in the lowest area, with greatest inclination).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil conditions at the sites Sonberk and Gotberg are almost identical, nevertheless, this beneficial influence is shown only by variants So-A and So-C and maximally up to the depth 240 or 190 mm. But most likely, in all variants at the site Gotberk, there appeared the above-mentioned influence of frequency of travel or heavier vehicles (for chemical protection) similarly to what Lagacherie [1] states. For comparison of the influence of the cover treatment, there can be used the fact that the root zone of plant community affects the soil horizon mostly up to the depth 300-400 mm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A suitable solution is the use of grassland systems made of diverse species of plant mixtures [1], which are the main tools in maintaining the soil fertility and partially a tool of quality management in viniculture [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depletion of soil fertility in general, along with the concomitant problems of weeds, pests and diseases, is the fundamental root cause of low agricultural production on a global level (Tan et al, 2005). Even if grapevines are not demanding with regard to nutrients, they nevertheless require an adequate supply, which may no longer exist in terroirs where the soils are undergoing degradation processes, especially soil losses (Le Bissonnais et al, 2007;Martínez-Casasnovas et al, 2009Paroissien et al, 2010;Novara et al, 2011;Quiquerez et al, 2014;Chevigny et al, 2014;Lieskovsky and Kenderessy, 2014), nutrient depletion (Ramos and Martínez-Casanovas, 2006), compaction (Lagacherie et al, 2006), salinization and sodization (Clark et al, 2002;Crescimanno and Garofalo, 2006; al., 2007; Costantini and Lorenzetti, 2013), pesticide runoff and deposition (Landry et al, 2005;Louchart and Voltz, 2007;Lacas et al, 2012;Daouk et al, 2013;Lefrancq et al, 2013) and copper contamination (Pieztrak and McPhail, 2004;Chopin et al, 2008;Komárek et al, 2008;Wightwick et al, 2008;Mirlean et al, 2007Mirlean et al, , 2009Rusjan et al, 2007;El Hadri et al, 2012;Fernández-Calviño et al, 2013;El Azzi et al, 2013;Lai et al, 2013). In Burgundy, using vine-stock unearthing-burying measurements (Brenot et al, 2008), Chevigny et al (2014) estimated that the erosion rate had increased significantly over the last decade and also that the spatial distribution of erosion had changed and was now basically controlled by ...…”
Section: Outlook: Terroir Sustainability Assessment and The Design Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%