2017
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4supl1p2265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial variability of meteorological observations and impacts on regional estimates of soybean grain productivity

Abstract: Brazil requires a fully representative weather network station; it is common to use data observed in locations distant from the region of interest. However, few studies have evaluated the efficiency and precision associated with the use of climate data, either estimated or interpolated, from stations far from the agricultural area of interest. Hence, this study aimed to demonstrate the impacts of spatial variability of the main meteorological elements on the regional estimate of soybean productivity. Regressio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Ferreira et al [19] the consistency of the data, the location and the distance from the meteorological stations to the place of interest are determining factors of precision of grain yield estimates based on meteorological data, mainly precipitation data. In their studies, soybean water balance was calculated with data recorded in three meteorological stations where they proved variability in rainfall distribution, which resulted in soybean yield discrepancies, estimated at the regional level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Ferreira et al [19] the consistency of the data, the location and the distance from the meteorological stations to the place of interest are determining factors of precision of grain yield estimates based on meteorological data, mainly precipitation data. In their studies, soybean water balance was calculated with data recorded in three meteorological stations where they proved variability in rainfall distribution, which resulted in soybean yield discrepancies, estimated at the regional level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%