2019
DOI: 10.5846/stxb201908251760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial-temporal characteristics of trade-off and synergy of ecosystem services in key vulnerable ecological areas in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed the same development trend as that in the research results of Qiulei Ji [30]. The results indicated that the spatial distribution of ESVs was less prominent in the north and more so in the south and that the values increased temporally, in accordance with the results reported by Wang [60] and Zhang Kun [61]. The agreement of findings on this point confirms the reliability and validity of our analysis, and supports the conclusion that although the policy of returning farmlands to forests has achieved a certain degree of success, it is still critically important to focus on the consolidation and development of the existing results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The results showed the same development trend as that in the research results of Qiulei Ji [30]. The results indicated that the spatial distribution of ESVs was less prominent in the north and more so in the south and that the values increased temporally, in accordance with the results reported by Wang [60] and Zhang Kun [61]. The agreement of findings on this point confirms the reliability and validity of our analysis, and supports the conclusion that although the policy of returning farmlands to forests has achieved a certain degree of success, it is still critically important to focus on the consolidation and development of the existing results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Greater synergy was found in ecosystem services in areas with ecological projects such as the TNSF, NFP, GGP, WGRG in comparison with non-engineering areas. Afforestation projects can affect the change of vegetation coverage, which can then affect ecosystem services (Wang et al, 2019) and have certain promotional effects on strengthening synergy and achieving ecological management goals. Areas with SFS decline are located mainly in the arid desert areas of Xinjiang.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The government designates the ecologically fragile areas accounting for more than 55% of China’s land [ 28 ]. The ecologically fragile areas are chartered with low stability, weak resistance, and high vulnerability [ 29 ] and often are related to poverty [ 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%