2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial spillover effect of urban landscape views on property price

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A host of spatial econometric models, such as the spatial lag model (SLM), the spatial error model (SEM), and the spatial Durbin model (SDM), can address the spatial autocorrelation issue, and they have been widely used to explain the relationship between property prices and property characteristics [54][55][56][57][58]. The SLM and the SEM are two basic spatial econometric models and focus on the endogenous interaction relationship (or spatial interaction in the dependent variable) and the correlated relationship (or spatial interaction in the error term), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A host of spatial econometric models, such as the spatial lag model (SLM), the spatial error model (SEM), and the spatial Durbin model (SDM), can address the spatial autocorrelation issue, and they have been widely used to explain the relationship between property prices and property characteristics [54][55][56][57][58]. The SLM and the SEM are two basic spatial econometric models and focus on the endogenous interaction relationship (or spatial interaction in the dependent variable) and the correlated relationship (or spatial interaction in the error term), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SDM jointly considers the spatial dependence of the dependent variable and that of independent variables [57,58,60,61] and allows for prices and hedonic characteristics of nearby properties to shape the price of a specific property. The SDM is proved to outperform the two basic models (the SLM and the SEM) and even regarded as "the only means of producing unbiased coefficient estimates" (p. 26) [61].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the spillover approach, several authors found that beneficial or detrimental effects of public expenditure (i.e., with regards to spending on infrastructure and road building, environmental services, recreation and cultural facilities, etc.) spread over the administrative boundary of one jurisdiction and affect the welfare of the residents of neighbouring jurisdictions (Baicker, ; Brueckner, ; Freret, ; Hui & Liang, ; Kelejian & Robinson, ; Revelli, , ; Schaltegger & Zemp, ; Solé‐Ollé, ). Within these models, a jurisdiction policy change on public expenditure and/or on tax revenues produces a strategic incentive for neighbouring jurisdiction to change their own policies.…”
Section: The Sources Of Spatial Interdependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A substantial number of studies have been published on the external effects of urban public service resources on housing prices. Their focus has been schools, parks, subways, and other public service facilities that are closely related to the lives of residents [3,[11][12][13][14][15]. In terms of educational resources, quality education resources often show a significant premium effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%