2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Spillover Effect of Rural Labor Transfer on the Eco-Efficiency of Cultivated Land Use: Evidence from China

Abstract: In this study, the influence of rural labor transfer and its spatial spillover effect on the eco-efficiency of cultivated land use (ECLU) in different regions were investigated using the undesirable super-efficiency epsilon based measure (EBM) and spatial Durbin models and data of 31 Chinese provinces for the period 1990–2018. The results show that: (1) China’s rural labor transfer rate increased; (2) in the east region, the ECLU has exceeded the national average level since 2001. In the west and northeast reg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific mechanisms are as follows: First, land transfer can reduce the economic threshold of rural labor transfer [ 38 , 39 , 40 ]. As a rational subject, smallholders will consider their expected benefits and economic costs when choosing labor transfer [ 41 ], the expected benefits of rural labor transfer being the sum of rental income from land transfer and non-farm income [ 42 , 43 ], and the economic cost of rural labor transfer being the sum of the opportunity cost of abandoning agricultural production and the cost of transferring to non-farm industries [ 44 ]. The transfer costs of rural labor to non-farm industries include the intermediary costs of land transfer, travel expenses for returns home to farm in busy season and labor fees, etc.…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific mechanisms are as follows: First, land transfer can reduce the economic threshold of rural labor transfer [ 38 , 39 , 40 ]. As a rational subject, smallholders will consider their expected benefits and economic costs when choosing labor transfer [ 41 ], the expected benefits of rural labor transfer being the sum of rental income from land transfer and non-farm income [ 42 , 43 ], and the economic cost of rural labor transfer being the sum of the opportunity cost of abandoning agricultural production and the cost of transferring to non-farm industries [ 44 ]. The transfer costs of rural labor to non-farm industries include the intermediary costs of land transfer, travel expenses for returns home to farm in busy season and labor fees, etc.…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial correlation of cultivated land utilization ecological efficiency refers to the exchange of cultivated land ecological efficiency in different regions through direct or indirect forms and the resulting spatial interaction between regions [1][2][3]. Under the joint promotion of the current agricultural production marketization, scale, and cross-regional coordinated development strategies, various agricultural production factors are accelerating in space and spreading, and the ecological efficiency of cultivated land utilization has begun to show obvious spatial effects [4][5][6][7], and have begun to form a complex spatial network structure. Scientific measurement of the Ecological efficiency of cultivated land utilization and comprehensive examination of its spatial association network characteristics and driving factors are of great significance for improving the Ecological efficiency of cultivated land utilization and promoting the development of green agriculture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the mainstream method to measure the degree of WLRM. In terms of CLUE, existing studies focus on the spatial-temporal characteristics and patterns of ecological efficiency of cropland use [15,16], influencing factors [17], and spatial spillover analysis [18] and then slowly expand to the relationship between the ecological efficiency of cropland use and urbanization [19]. Research scales include national scale, regional scale [20], and provincial scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%