2016
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial seismic modeling of base‐isolated buildings pounding against moat walls: effects of ground motion directionality and mass eccentricity

Abstract: Summary Structural impact between adjacent buildings may induce local and, in some extreme cases, severe damage, especially in the case of seismically isolated buildings. This study parametrically investigates in the three‐dimensional domain the effect of pounding on the peak response of base‐isolated buildings, which are simulated as nonlinear three‐dimensional multi‐degree‐of‐freedom systems. Firstly, it is shown that considering unidirectional, instead of bidirectional, excitations may lead to underestimati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structures are analyzed for the 5 bidirectional ground-motions, each one rotated with a constant step of 5° in the range of 0° to 360°. The main results arising from these simulations with regards to the ground motion orientation effect, are in line with previous observations [18] (i) the incidence angle of excitation significantly affects the maximum response of the structures in the X-direction, (ii) the critical angle corresponding to the peak response over all possible excitation orientations varies with the selected ground motion and the dynamic characteristics of the structures, and (iii) the FN/FP drifts (θ=0°) are not always conservative. Figure 3: Peak unobstructed relative displacements of (a) the 3-story base-isolated building, and (b) the 2-story, (c) 3-story, and the (d) 4-story; fixed-based structures, in X-direction, in terms of the incidence angle.…”
Section: Effect Of Seismic Orientation On the Peak Response Without Psupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The structures are analyzed for the 5 bidirectional ground-motions, each one rotated with a constant step of 5° in the range of 0° to 360°. The main results arising from these simulations with regards to the ground motion orientation effect, are in line with previous observations [18] (i) the incidence angle of excitation significantly affects the maximum response of the structures in the X-direction, (ii) the critical angle corresponding to the peak response over all possible excitation orientations varies with the selected ground motion and the dynamic characteristics of the structures, and (iii) the FN/FP drifts (θ=0°) are not always conservative. Figure 3: Peak unobstructed relative displacements of (a) the 3-story base-isolated building, and (b) the 2-story, (c) 3-story, and the (d) 4-story; fixed-based structures, in X-direction, in terms of the incidence angle.…”
Section: Effect Of Seismic Orientation On the Peak Response Without Psupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This research work utilizes the computational methodology described in [18,20], aiming to thoroughly investigate the circumstances under which spatial pounding of base-isolated buildings may occur and assess the effect of some important parameters on the peak structural response due to potential structural pounding. In order to efficiently and effectively estimate the impact forces that should be applied at detected impact points on each structure in contact, an appropriate 3D impact model is used.…”
Section: Spatial (3d) Simulation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e lumped masses are assumed to be the same at each floor, i.e., 16.315 t. e stiffness and damping coefficients of each story reduce from the top floor to the ground floor. Instead of assuming a value for the pounding stiffness and the pounding damping, they can be obtained from a linear viscoelastic pounding model [22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Seismic Control Of An Mdof Structure With Ptrmdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"""RQO =@ xOW |R=U=OH |=yxR=U MU=B VR}QwQi OQmrta QO |}xRQr RQO |xR=Ov= QF= [20] '2013 u= Q=mty w wm "O@=}|t OQwt |}xRQr RQO '|}=yQ=Owtv |x= Q= =@ w OvOQm |UQQ@ = Q xOW |R=U=OH |=yxR=U QO =yv; G}=Dv T=U= Q@ "OvOR u}tND = Q Q_v OQwt |OQmrta K]U uDW=O |= Q@ R=}v |xRwL |=yxrRrR x@ C@Uv |}xRQr RQO |= Q@ |QDW}@ R=}v 'l}ORv |xRwL |=yxrRrR 'CU= QDt|r}t 600 Q@=Q@ xm 'uB=S QO pw=ODt |}xRQr RQO u}=Q@=v@ "OQ=O OwHw QwO QwmPt |UQQ@ u}vJty "OQ=Ov j@=]D Q_v OQwt OQmrta =@ '=yCr=L |xty |= Q@ , =twRr |xR=UwQ |= Q@ |@v=H Ctw=kt V}=Ri= s=ovy |}xRQr RQO R=}v Vy=m |xOvyOu=Wv , =@} QkD Q}PBpmWQ}e |xR=UwQ |= Q@ Ctw=kt V}=Ri= u}= xm |r=L QO 'CU= Q}PBpmW "CU= Q}F -=D|@ OwN C=ar=]t QO = Q |Dw=iDt OQwNQ@ |=ypOt [21] '2009 u= Q=mty w u=m w OvQ=O |QDW}@ |Q}PBpmW R=}v 'QDu}}=B C=k@] xm OvDi=} QO w OvDiQo Q_v QÒ w[wt u}= "OvDUy l}ORv |xRwL |=yxrRrR QO xS}w x@ OQwNQ@ Q}F -=D CLD QDW}@ [22] '2017 u= Q=mty w qm}vwQwt "OQ=O xRQru}tR |Ot=U@ |=wDLt x@ |oDU@ xOW |R=U=OH |=yxR=U MU=B QO = Q 5 C} RmQt R= GwQN w xrRrR |Q}PBCyH QF= 'OvQ=O C} RmQt R= GwQN xm |}=yxR=U QO OQwNQ@ OvO=O u=Wv w OvOQm |UQQ@ x@ |}xk@] u=}t Vv=Q xm OW XNWt u}vJty "OQ=O |QDW}@ ?wr]t=v Q=F; [23] '2007 u= Q=mty w TwtwQOwtm "CU= xrRrR |Q}PBCyH x@ xDU@=w COW u=}t Vv=Q w C=k@] ?=DW QO = Q Q=w}O |DNU Ovv=t |tyt |=yQDt= Q=B Q}F -=D ?=DW u= R}t '|}xk@] u=}t Vv=Q hqNQ@ xm OvDi=} QO w OvOQm xar=]t |}xk@] |D=ar=]t "OQ=O xOvQ=OR=@ Q=w}O |DNU Q=Okt x@ |Q=}U@ |oDU@=w C=k@] QO u= Q=mty w p=wQ=o; [25] '2003 O}vH w Q=o=UD=t [24] '2000 =wt}O \UwD xm |xOvyO u=Wv 'CU= xOW s=Hv= [27] '2012 =t=Qm} w}H} w w CvB [26] 6 xv=owO |WRer |=yQo=OH OQwt QO |@=QN Q=m w R=U QO |O=}R Q}F -=D '=yv; <=vLv=`=aW w R=U=OH |=yxU=ms}v`=aW w s}v QwO QO xm 7 |@v=H CmQL |xOvvmOwOLt |=yx@r =@ OQwNQ@ QF= QO =yQo =OH OQwt QO [32] "OQ=O -CU= xDiQo Q= Qk =m} Qt; QO pw=ODt |WRer |=yQo=OH |=yxU=m xOW s=Hv= Qo = Q}t =@ RDQy |]NQ}e Qvi uOQm |R=wt =@ OQwNQ@ |R=UpOt 'Q}N= [33] "CU= [13] "O@=} |Q}otWJ Vy=m CU= |m =m]Y= |=yQo=OH =@ xOW |R=U=OH |=yxR=U x@ |r}rLD |=yTr=B p=ta= =@ O=H}= Ea=@ xrRrR |Q}PBCyH xm OvOQm XNWt w |UQQ@ xv=oxU w xv=owO 'xO=U u=mt= Cr=L u}= QO w OwW|t |@=DQB V@vH x@ C@Uv |QDW}@ |}xRQr |=yR=}v OwHw u}tR V@vH |q=@ |=yCaQU |= Q@ =yQo =OH |xU=m s}v |x@r =@ OQwNQ@ "OwW|t |}xRQr |=yR=}v V}=Ri= Ea=@ |r}rLD Tr=B ?w=vD |xQwO V}=Ri= w OQ=O |=yV@vH w nQR@ Q=}U@ |=yxrRrR QO xv}W}@ |@v=H |}=Hx@=H C}ty= x@ xHwD =@ xJve w u=Lr= '=yQo=OH |}=Hx@=H C}iQ_ uOw@ OwOLt w l}ORv |xRwL |Ur=B |=v@t Q@ xOW |R=U=OH |=yxR=U |}xRQr OQmrta OQw; Q@ |= Q@ = Q |WwQ [16] 2016 uOQm OwOLt xm OvO=O u=Wv w OvOQm x=Q= C=k@] ?=DW w |@v=H |}=Hx@=H Q=}at wO G}=Dv "CU= Q=wWO Q=}U@ q=@ ?w=vD |xQwO =@ |Ur=B |=yV@vH QO Q=}at wO Qy QO = Q [14] '2001 |rm w O}vH w [13] xDiQo CQwY u; |xQ=@QO |Q=}U@ |=yVywSB w xOW xDN=vW |@ wN x@ uwo=vwo R=}v Rwvy`v=t`wv Qy =@ OQwNQ@ s=ovy w nQR@ |=y|}=Hx@=H QO =yv; Q=DiQ |rw 'CU= |xrUt [13] '1995 u= Q=mty w p=y Q=@ u}DUNv |= Q@ "OQ=O |...…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%