2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial prediction of soil organic matter content integrating artificial neural network and ordinary kriging in Tibetan Plateau

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
85
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
7
85
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of MLR and ANN methods, residual kriging contributed to better accuracy of the basal area estimates. These results are consistent with the results of Dai et al (2014), who reported that the combination of the residual kriging with artificial neural networks provides an improvement in the estimate accuracy of the variables of interest. The combination of MLR with residual kriging also provided improvements in estimates in the studies of Viana et al (2012), Castillo-Santiago et al (2013), and GaleanaPizaña et al (2014.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In the case of MLR and ANN methods, residual kriging contributed to better accuracy of the basal area estimates. These results are consistent with the results of Dai et al (2014), who reported that the combination of the residual kriging with artificial neural networks provides an improvement in the estimate accuracy of the variables of interest. The combination of MLR with residual kriging also provided improvements in estimates in the studies of Viana et al (2012), Castillo-Santiago et al (2013), and GaleanaPizaña et al (2014.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The estimated results of the SOM content by ELMOK were much closer to the measured values, which were demonstrated an acceptable range for monitoring site-specific SOM and its quality evaluation in comparison with [8,13,14]. Generally, a higher resolution and higher precision of SOM can capture its changes more acutely in a regional spatial range, while it is difficult to reflect the continuous dynamic changes because only one year of data is used.…”
Section: Sustainable Monitoring Of Digital Mapping For Sommentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Not only did it need to re-modeled and re-trained as the model lacked robustness and stability, but it also avoided over-fitting because the sample variations disrupted the one-to-one relationships between the pixel value of the auxiliary variables and the samples of SOM. In other words, the first subset produced was random, yet the validation set was independent in the subsequent process of modeling analysis [14,31]. Table 1 summarizes the descriptive statistics of SOM and the auxiliary variables at all sites in the study area.…”
Section: Accuracy Evaluation Of Prediction Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To determine the output value for each location, the Kriging tool fits a mathematical function to a specified number of points, or all points within a specified radius. The Kriging process involves the following steps: a) exploratory statistical analysis of the data, b) variogram modeling, c) creating the surface, and d) exploring a variance surface which is optional (29,30). The estimator in the Kriging method is defined as follows (Equation 1):…”
Section: Statistical Analysis and Spatial Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%