2013
DOI: 10.1134/s2079970513040035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial possibilities and barriers of the postindustrial development of a regional metropolis (the Case Study of Rostov-on-Don)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first trend is the continuing concentration of the country's population in the largest multifunction cities, which serve as regional capitals. This is in line with the overall national trend (Druzhinin 2013). This process is observed in Saint Petersburg (its population has increased by 530,000 people or 11.3% in the post-Soviet period), Rostov-on-Don (96,000 or 9.6%), Kaliningrad (52,000 or 13%), and some other cities.…”
Section: The Coastalisation Of Russia's Population: the Role Of The Sea Factorsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The first trend is the continuing concentration of the country's population in the largest multifunction cities, which serve as regional capitals. This is in line with the overall national trend (Druzhinin 2013). This process is observed in Saint Petersburg (its population has increased by 530,000 people or 11.3% in the post-Soviet period), Rostov-on-Don (96,000 or 9.6%), Kaliningrad (52,000 or 13%), and some other cities.…”
Section: The Coastalisation Of Russia's Population: the Role Of The Sea Factorsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The population growth rates are mapped and compared with the facts of emerging and growing trade and logistics facilities, settlements and recreational areas, large enterprises and higher education institutions, as well as their clustering trends, which intensify intraagglomeration interactions. The inclusion of Shakhty, Novoshakhtinsk and Volgodonsk into the research area for evaluating the territorial system of the Rostov agglomeration is an unusual approach (Druzhinin, 2013;Merinov & Merinova, 2014;Bredikhin, 2016;Andreyeva, 2011;Abdullaev & Mishchenko, 2017). However, we believe this will increase the accuracy of research and enable us to track the development trends of the first and second agglomerations arcs more fully, taking into account the presence of a geographically remote third arc at the North-East.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods and approaches are most applicable in relation to monocentric agglomerations, having in their administrativeterritorial structure one clearly dominant center forming the core of agglomeration. Undoubtedly, Bolshoi Rostov can be attributed to this type as the largest urban agglomeration of southern Russia (Druzhinin, 2013;Fedorovskaia & Shishkunova, 2016).…”
Section: Methods For Studying the Cities Interaction As Business Entitmentioning
confidence: 99%