2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-09842-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial modeling of soil organic carbon using remotely sensed indices and environmental field inventory variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 86 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plant canopy water content can be predicted from the reflectance of the plant-enhanced vegetation index of MODIS 250 m EVI for each image pixel value of the cropland [ 21 ]. The principle of geographically weighted regression modeling (GWR) for predicting [ 95 , 89 , 99 , 100 ] crop water balance based on crop growth curve for crop heterogeneity as model parameter calibration [ 101 ] proved to be conceptually important. In this concept, crop data is considered as model input and its extension of OLS (Ordinary Least Squares) regression allows to consider locally varying parameters as spatial instability in a sample and the stochastic working principle of the (GWR) model [ 102 ] as follows in the (equation (5) ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant canopy water content can be predicted from the reflectance of the plant-enhanced vegetation index of MODIS 250 m EVI for each image pixel value of the cropland [ 21 ]. The principle of geographically weighted regression modeling (GWR) for predicting [ 95 , 89 , 99 , 100 ] crop water balance based on crop growth curve for crop heterogeneity as model parameter calibration [ 101 ] proved to be conceptually important. In this concept, crop data is considered as model input and its extension of OLS (Ordinary Least Squares) regression allows to consider locally varying parameters as spatial instability in a sample and the stochastic working principle of the (GWR) model [ 102 ] as follows in the (equation (5) ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%