Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
Advanced Air Pollution 2011
DOI: 10.5772/17734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Interpolation Methodologies in Urban Air Pollution Modeling: Application for the Greater Area of Metropolitan Athens, Greece

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to visualize the regional profiles of air pollution across China, we applied a spatial interpolation approach to generate a nationally continuous surface of exposure to PM 2.5 based on annual average values for the 190 cities (Deligiorgi and Philippopoulos, 2011;Jerrett et al, 2005;Ramos et al, 2015;Yanosky et al, 2014). Among numerous spatial interpolation methods, we chose the Empirical Bayesian Kriging (EBK), a geostatistical technique that permits accurate interpolation of spatially intensive data (e.g., air pollution) and provides dependable diagnosis of the uncertainty of model predictions (Brown et al, 1994;Roberts et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to visualize the regional profiles of air pollution across China, we applied a spatial interpolation approach to generate a nationally continuous surface of exposure to PM 2.5 based on annual average values for the 190 cities (Deligiorgi and Philippopoulos, 2011;Jerrett et al, 2005;Ramos et al, 2015;Yanosky et al, 2014). Among numerous spatial interpolation methods, we chose the Empirical Bayesian Kriging (EBK), a geostatistical technique that permits accurate interpolation of spatially intensive data (e.g., air pollution) and provides dependable diagnosis of the uncertainty of model predictions (Brown et al, 1994;Roberts et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of these limitations, both methods are no longer commonly used in air pollution estimation recently. However, they usually appear in the comparative studies of spatial interpolation methods [19,25,[48][49][50][51]. In addition, some researchers started applying compressed sensing to estimate the pollution level at unmeasured locations by discovering the spatial correlations among multiple heterogeneous air pollution data [52,53].…”
Section: Spatial Interpolation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9]'da farklı mekânsal çözünürlükte çeşitli enterpolasyon yöntemlerinden türetilen SYM doğruluğu üzerinde farklı topografyaya sahip arazi türlerinin ve nokta yoğunlukların etkileri belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Deligiorgi ve Philippopoulos [10]'da hava kirliliği modellemesi alanında kullanılan istatistiksel mekânsal enterpolasyon yöntemlerinden bahsedilmiştir. Gümüş ve Şen [11]'de engebeli arazi morfolojisine ait bir sayısal yükseklik modelinde farklı nokta yoğunlukları ve dağılımları gözetilerek yapay sinir ağları ve enterpolasyon yöntemleri karşılaştırılmıştır.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified