2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial gradients of GCR protons in the inner heliosphere derived fromUlyssesCOSPIN/KET and PAMELA measurements

Abstract: Context. During the transition from solar cycle 23 to 24 from 2006 to 2009, the Sun was in an unusual solar minimum with very low activity over a long period. These exceptional conditions included a very low interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) strength and a high tilt angle, which both play an important role in the modulation of galactic cosmic rays (GCR) in the heliosphere. Thus, the radial and latitudinal gradients of GCRs are very much expected to depend not only on the solar magnetic epoch, but also on the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is shown that the radial gradients are always positive while the latitudinal gradients are always negative as expected but with less magnitude than that predicted by earlier works (Potgieter et al 2001). Following de Simone et al (2011) and Gieseler & Heber (2016), Vos & Potgieter (2016) also used a numerical model to compute the spatial gradients of protons from 2006 to 2009. They concluded that although the drift effects were weaker than the predictions from those drift-dominated works due to the suppression by the excess diffusion, they still played an important role due to the significant decrease of HMF magnitude until the end of 2009.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…It is shown that the radial gradients are always positive while the latitudinal gradients are always negative as expected but with less magnitude than that predicted by earlier works (Potgieter et al 2001). Following de Simone et al (2011) and Gieseler & Heber (2016), Vos & Potgieter (2016) also used a numerical model to compute the spatial gradients of protons from 2006 to 2009. They concluded that although the drift effects were weaker than the predictions from those drift-dominated works due to the suppression by the excess diffusion, they still played an important role due to the significant decrease of HMF magnitude until the end of 2009.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In Figure 9 the modelling results from Figure 8 are compared to the observational gradients calculated in this study and to observational gradients from De Simone et al (2011) and the very recent study of Gieseler and Heber (2016). The latter investigation used a more sophisticated approach, producing two sets of results for global gradients based on two statistical fitting methods, as indicated in the figure.…”
Section: Calculating Spatial Gradientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, this spectrometer allowed one to determine the most accurate differential intensities of protons (Aguilar et al, 2015b), helium nuclei (Aguilar et al, 2015a), antiprotons (Aguilar et al, 2016), electrons and positrons (Aguilar et al, 2014). The high precision of these experimental data together with those from Ulysses spacecraft (e.g., see Simpson et al, 1992;Simpson et al, 1996;Ferrando et al, 1996;De Simone et al, 2011;Gieseler and Heber, 2016) constitute a challenge for any modulation model of the inner part of heliosphere. Actually such a treatment has to reproduce the observed GCR spectra transported -during different solar activity phases -down to Earth and, also, outside the ecliptic plane at distances from Sun ranging from about 1 to 5 AU.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects are treated in the Parker transport equation through the terms including the drift velocity. The analysis on Ulysses out-of-ecliptic observations (e.g., see Simpson, 1996;Simpson et al, 1996;Heber et al, , 1998Heber et al, , 2008Ferrando et al, 1996;De Simone et al, 2011;Gieseler and Heber, 2016) provided, so far, a unique point of view highlighting the presence of latitudinal gradients in the spatial distribution of GCRs, during period of low solar activity, i.e., when the combination of particle charge (q) and solar magnetic polarity (A) is positive (qA > 0); while a more uniform distribution of GCRs in the inner part of the heliosphere occurs for qA < 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%