2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-016-0945-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Gradients for Cosmic-Ray Protons in the Heliosphere During the Solar Minimum of Cycle 23/24

Abstract: Global gradients for cosmic-ray (CR) protons in the heliosphere are computed with a comprehensive modulation model for the recent prolonged solar minimum of Cycle 23/24. Fortunately, the PAMELA (Payload for Antimatter Matter Exploration and Light-nuclei Astrophysics) and Ulysses/KET (Kiel Electron Telescope) instruments simultaneously observed proton intensities for the period between July 2006 and June 2009. This provides a good opportunity to compare the basic features of the model with these observations, i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result agrees well with previous studies (e.g. Vos and Potgieter, 2016;Gieseler and Heber, 2016). The slope during the comet phase was found to be -2.8±0.12 %/AU.…”
Section: Helioradial Gradient Of Cosmic Rayssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result agrees well with previous studies (e.g. Vos and Potgieter, 2016;Gieseler and Heber, 2016). The slope during the comet phase was found to be -2.8±0.12 %/AU.…”
Section: Helioradial Gradient Of Cosmic Rayssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…After that period, the count rate variation and the ratio is in very good agreement with the expectation of a positive radial gradient of about 2.9 %/AU (e.g. Vos and Potgieter, 2016;Gieseler and Heber, 2016).…”
Section: Helioradial Gradient Of Cosmic Rayssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It is shown that the radial gradients are always positive while the latitudinal gradients are always negative as expected but with less magnitude than that predicted by earlier works (Potgieter et al 2001). Following de Simone et al (2011) and Gieseler & Heber (2016), Vos & Potgieter (2016) also used a numerical model to compute the spatial gradients of protons from 2006 to 2009. They concluded that although the drift effects were weaker than the predictions from those drift-dominated works due to the suppression by the excess diffusion, they still played an important role due to the significant decrease of HMF magnitude until the end of 2009.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…As discussed in Bobik et al (2012), we used an enhanced K ⊥,θ in the polar regions; this enhancement is an implicit way of reducing drift effects by changing the CR intensity gradients significantly (Potgieter, 2013) in order to reproduce the amplitude and rigidity dependence of the latitudinal gradients of GCR differential intensities for protons (see Sect. 5.4 and, e.g., Vos and Potgieter, 2016). Moving towards the solar maximum the rate of coronal mass ejections (CME) increases leading to a more chaotic structure of the solar magnetic field and to a stronger turbulence regime.…”
Section: The Diffusion Tensormentioning
confidence: 99%