2006
DOI: 10.4005/jjfs.88.354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Distribution of Soil Water Repellency in a Japanese Cypress Plantation and an Adjacent Deciduous Broad-leaved Forest.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crockford et al (1991) measured water repellency in surface soils along a transect crossing a catchment in a direction perpendicular to valley bottom, and noted that the water repellency was weak compared to the hillslope segments and frequently Upper (2005) Middle (2005) Lower (2005) Upper (2006) Middle (2006) Lower (2006) Cumulative rainfall ( disappeared in the valley bottom. A similar tendency was obtained in a Japanese cypress plantation hillslope investigated by Kobayashi et al (2006), who found that the lack of water repellency at the bottom of the hillslope was associated with a high soil water content, whereas strong water repellency was distributed in the upper part of the hillslope. They also found that, except for the bottom of the hillslope, the whole area of the hillslope was potentially water repellent, i.e.…”
Section: Relationship Between Soil Moisture and Infiltration Ratesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Crockford et al (1991) measured water repellency in surface soils along a transect crossing a catchment in a direction perpendicular to valley bottom, and noted that the water repellency was weak compared to the hillslope segments and frequently Upper (2005) Middle (2005) Lower (2005) Upper (2006) Middle (2006) Lower (2006) Cumulative rainfall ( disappeared in the valley bottom. A similar tendency was obtained in a Japanese cypress plantation hillslope investigated by Kobayashi et al (2006), who found that the lack of water repellency at the bottom of the hillslope was associated with a high soil water content, whereas strong water repellency was distributed in the upper part of the hillslope. They also found that, except for the bottom of the hillslope, the whole area of the hillslope was potentially water repellent, i.e.…”
Section: Relationship Between Soil Moisture and Infiltration Ratesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These wet areas in individual plots, expand during wet conditions, suggesting greater of interconnectivity of flow paths with increasing water content [12]- [14]. Soil water repellency causes preferential infiltration [15] and it has been shown that soil water repellency increases with decreasing soil moisture [16]. Preferential infiltration including via macropores within the soil matrix was observed in a slope segment of this forested catchment based on dye tests [6] and hydrological observations [12]- [14].…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Of Soil Moisture At a Small Scalementioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, results from our study indicate that surface topography is more important in affecting surface soil moisture (soil depth ≤ 6 cm) than bedrock topography. Water repellency could also affect the water flow in forest soils not only at the plot scale but also at a slope scale [16], although at larger scales this effect is likely diminished [20]. The effect of stemflow on groundwater recharge has been shown to be relatively large in forests due to preferential infiltration [21] [22].…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Of Soil Moisture At the Small Catchmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no significant relationship between these patterns of change and soil characteristics was found, suggesting that water infiltration on the forest soil surface depends on local soil characteristics rather than average soil characteristics. Liang et al [22] and Kobayashi et al [17] showed that root development plays an important role in soil water infiltration, so it was hypothesized that the water movement in the forest floor soil surface was controlled by the combination of roots and SWR intensity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, low infiltration, overland flow and soil erosion have been reported in mountainous plantations where the soil surface was coated with water-repellent substances [3][4][5][13][14][15]. Although the possible impact of these properties on SWR intensity has been well discussed in previous studies [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], it remains unclear how these soil properties are distributed around trees on a slope. A standing tree on a slope provides different conditions in the areas upslope and downslope of its trunk [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%