2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-021-09062-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial distribution, environmental risk assessment, and source identification of potentially toxic metals in Atikhisar dam, Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the exception of the heavy metals Cd and Hg, all the other eight metals are classified as low ecological risk, and the average E r values in descending order are Hg>Cd>As>Cu>Ni>Pb>Sn>Cr>Zn>Mn. This order is in general accordance with the ecological risk values ranking of heavy metals in Turkey by Fural [38]. The range of E r values for Cd is 30-108, spanning three classes of low ecological risk, moderate ecological risk and considerable ecological risk, with respective percentages of 8.7%, 78.3% and 13.0%.…”
Section: Potential Ecological Risk Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…With the exception of the heavy metals Cd and Hg, all the other eight metals are classified as low ecological risk, and the average E r values in descending order are Hg>Cd>As>Cu>Ni>Pb>Sn>Cr>Zn>Mn. This order is in general accordance with the ecological risk values ranking of heavy metals in Turkey by Fural [38]. The range of E r values for Cd is 30-108, spanning three classes of low ecological risk, moderate ecological risk and considerable ecological risk, with respective percentages of 8.7%, 78.3% and 13.0%.…”
Section: Potential Ecological Risk Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Global academic research on ecological risk is mainly divided into environmental science (Min et al, 2013;Xu Q. et al, 2021), Ecology (Wenning, 2011), Public Environmental Health (Charabi et al, 2018), Zoology (Flores-Serrano et al, 2014), Toxicology (Fural et al, 2021) and Biodiversity Conservation (Nawrocki et al, 2019) and other directions. As far as the study area is concerned, it is mainly the river basin (Zhu et al, 2022), wetlands (Malekmohammadi and Blouchi, 2014;Li et al, 2020), desert oasis (Han et al, 2022) and other key ecological protection areas and heavy metal industrial areas such as industrial and mining wasteland (Peng et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EF and Igeo indexes are employed as indicators to identify and quantify the degree of elemental pollution, as well as to evaluate the intensity of anthropogenic contaminants collected in sediment (Looi et al, 2019;Barbieri, 2016). To date, numerous studies have used the EF and Igeo to assess the contribution of anthropogenic inputs of elements in sediment (Özkan, 2012;Özkan and Büyükışık, 2012;Kaya et al, 2017;Kükrer et al, 2020;Fural et al, 2020;Fural et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%