2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2004.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial data methods and vague regions: A rough set approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since RST is useful in analyzing data with insufficient and incomplete knowledge it has been applied in many traditional domains including finance, medicine, telecommunications, vibration analysis, control theory, signal analysis, pattern recognition, and image analysis (Yasdi, 1996;Polkowski and Skowron, 1998;Polkowski et al, 2000;Skowron, 2001;Leung and Li, 2003). The literature has also revealed that RST has been applied to problems of spatial analysis (Bittner, 2001;Bittner and Stell, 2001); spatial classification and uncertainty analysis (Ahlqvist et al, 2000(Ahlqvist et al, , 2003, geo-knowledge discovery (Wang et al, 2001;Beaubouef et al, 2007), remote sensing image classification (Dong et al, 2007), and in the extraction of decision rules in GIS and remote sensing (Berger, 2004;Leung et al, 2007;Bai et al, 2009). Moreover, Cao et al (2009) initially attempted to extract the spatial relationship indicator rules based on RST.…”
Section: Brief Remarks On Rough Set Theory and Its Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since RST is useful in analyzing data with insufficient and incomplete knowledge it has been applied in many traditional domains including finance, medicine, telecommunications, vibration analysis, control theory, signal analysis, pattern recognition, and image analysis (Yasdi, 1996;Polkowski and Skowron, 1998;Polkowski et al, 2000;Skowron, 2001;Leung and Li, 2003). The literature has also revealed that RST has been applied to problems of spatial analysis (Bittner, 2001;Bittner and Stell, 2001); spatial classification and uncertainty analysis (Ahlqvist et al, 2000(Ahlqvist et al, , 2003, geo-knowledge discovery (Wang et al, 2001;Beaubouef et al, 2007), remote sensing image classification (Dong et al, 2007), and in the extraction of decision rules in GIS and remote sensing (Berger, 2004;Leung et al, 2007;Bai et al, 2009). Moreover, Cao et al (2009) initially attempted to extract the spatial relationship indicator rules based on RST.…”
Section: Brief Remarks On Rough Set Theory and Its Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to [5], rough sets, 9-intersection modeling, RCC theory and egg-yolk approaches are useful for managing the types of uncertainty related to topology. These include concepts, such as nearness, contiguity, connection, orientation, inclusion and overlap of spatial entities.…”
Section: Topological Uncertainty In Spatial Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consistency of topological relations between CBBRs in multi-resolution spatial databases can be evaluated from two points of view: (1) if the relation matrix at a small scale is a subset of the one at a large scale for the same pair of CBBRs, then they are consistent; (2) if some relations in the relation matrix at a small scale are included in the one at a large scale, while others are not, then it is necessary to evaluate whether the latter set of relations can be derived from the matrix at the large scale. If the answer is yes, then they are consistent; otherwise, not.…”
Section: Hybrid Approach Of Merging and Dropping Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the crisp objects have multiple representations in an integrated database, the BBRs also have different representations at different scales. Recent work about uncertain regions was to model vague regions with fuzzy sets and rough sets [2,9], and to formalize fuzzy topological relations [3,11,12,30]. Complex regions with broad boundaries (CBBRs), which are composed of a set of regions, have more complex structures than crisp objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%